Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Tight glycemic targets in GDM reduce LGA births and cesarean rates but increase insulin use

Tight glycemic targets in GDM reduce LGA births and cesarean rates but increase insulin use
Photo by Alexander Grey / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that tight GDM targets may reduce LGA births but increase insulin requirements.

This single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial enrolled 650 women with gestational diabetes mellitus (singleton pregnancies, 12-31 weeks' gestation), with 626 (96.3%) providing primary outcome data. Participants were assigned to tight glycemic targets (fasting <5.1 mmol/L, 1-hour postprandial <7.0 mmol/L) or less tight targets (fasting <5.3 mmol/L, postprandial <7.8 mmol/L). The primary outcome was incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants.

The tight-target group had a significantly lower incidence of LGA infants (19.2% vs 26.5%; adjusted relative risk 0.61; 95% CI 0.42-0.89; p=0.010). Cesarean delivery rates were also lower (23% vs 29.9%; aRR 0.63; p=0.012), and gestational weight gain was reduced (10.1 kg vs 10.7 kg; p=0.006). However, insulin use was higher in the tight-target group (32.6% vs 21.6%; aRR 1.67; p=0.005).

Safety data showed serious complications were low and comparable between groups. Maternal hypoglycemia rates were also low and comparable. The study did not report long-term outcomes for mothers or infants, quality of life measures, or cost-effectiveness.

This intention-to-treat analysis from a single-center RCT suggests tighter glycemic control may reduce some adverse perinatal outcomes but increases the need for insulin therapy. The open-label design and lack of long-term data limit definitive conclusions about clinical implementation.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIMS: To determine if tight glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) reduces adverse outcomes compared to less tight targets. METHODS: In a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial, 650 women with GDM (singleton pregnancies, 12-31 weeks' gestation) were randomized to tight (fasting < 5.1 mmol/L, 1-h postprandial < 7.0 mmol/L) or less tight (fasting < 5.3 mmol/L, postprandial < 7.8 mmol/L) targets. The primary outcome was the incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants. Secondary outcomes included measures of maternal and neonatal health, analyzed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Of 650 enrolled women, 626 (96.3%) completed the trial with primary outcome data. The tight-target group had a lower incidence of LGA (19.2% vs. 26.5%; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.61, 95%CI 0.42-0.89; p = 0.010), lower cesarean rates (23% vs. 29.9%; aRR 0.63; p = 0.012), and reduced gestational weight gain (10.1 vs. 10.7 kg; p = 0.006). Insulin use was higher with tight targets (32.6% vs. 21.6%; aRR 1.67; p = 0.005). Serious complications and maternal hypoglycemia rates were low and comparable. CONCLUSION: Tight glycemic targets in GDM lower the risk of LGA births, cesarean delivery, and excess maternal weight gain without increasing severe adverse events, though they necessitate more frequent insulin therapy.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.