Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Creatinine levels show J-shaped association with adverse events after PCI for myocardial infarctionHigh Creatinine? Your Heart Risk Might Surprise You

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider the J-shaped association between creatinine and post-PCI adverse events as observational, not causal.

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,878 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study examined creatinine levels as an exposure, but the comparator was not reported. The primary outcome was three types of adverse events that occurred post-procedure.

The main result was a J-shaped relationship between creatinine levels and the likelihood of the three adverse events, with a nonlinear P value of < 0.001. There were 996 instances (25.7%) of adverse events reported. The effect size was not reported.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported, including adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations. The follow-up duration was not reported.

Key limitations include the observational design, which cannot establish causation, and the lack of a comparator group. The study does not report specific creatinine thresholds or independent predictive values beyond the J-shaped relationship.

Practice relevance is not reported. The findings suggest an association between creatinine levels and post-PCI adverse events in this population, but clinical application requires caution due to the study's design and missing details.

  • High creatinine linked to higher heart risks after stent procedure
  • Helps heart attack survivors with kidney concerns
  • Not ready for clinics — but changes how we see risk

This could change how doctors assess heart patients after surgery.

Imagine getting a stent to open a blocked heart artery. You’re feeling better. But a routine blood test shows your creatinine is a little high. You’ve heard that means your kidneys aren’t working perfectly. Now, new research says it might also mean your heart is at greater risk — but not in the way anyone expected.

And here’s the twist: very low creatinine may also carry risk.

Heart attacks are still a leading cause of death worldwide. Many patients survive thanks to procedures like PCI — where doctors insert a stent to open a blocked artery. But some people still face serious problems afterward, like another heart attack, stroke, or heart-related death.

That’s why predicting who’s at risk matters. One common clue doctors use is creatinine — a waste product in the blood. High levels usually suggest the kidneys aren’t filtering well. And since heart and kidney health are closely linked, doctors often assume: higher creatinine = higher risk.

But this study challenges that simple idea.

The surprising shift

For years, doctors thought the higher the creatinine, the worse the outcome. Linear. Straightforward. But this study found something different.

It’s not a straight line. It’s a J-shape.

That means risk is highest at both ends — when creatinine is very high and when it’s very low. The safest zone? Somewhere in the middle.

What scientists didn’t expect

Most people assume low creatinine is always good. But this study suggests otherwise. Patients with very low levels also faced higher risks.

Why? Low creatinine can mean poor muscle mass or malnutrition — signs of frailty. In heart attack survivors, being underweight or weak may make recovery harder.

So high creatinine may signal kidney stress. Low creatinine may signal body weakness. Both can be dangerous.

Think of your body like a city. Blood is the traffic. The heart pumps it. The kidneys clean it. Creatinine is like trash — a normal byproduct of daily life.

When traffic flows well, trash gets removed on time. But if the cleanup trucks (kidneys) slow down, trash builds up — creatinine rises.

But if there’s too little trash? That could mean the city isn’t active. Fewer people. Less energy. That’s like low muscle mass — a sign the body isn’t strong enough to recover.

This doesn’t mean this treatment is available yet.

Researchers looked at 3,878 heart attack patients who had stents placed between 2018 and 2020. They tracked three major problems in the following years: heart attack, stroke, or heart-related death. They checked each patient’s creatinine level right after the procedure and followed their health for an average of two years.

One in four patients — 25.7% — had one of the three major complications.

The data showed a clear J-shaped pattern. Patients with the highest creatinine had the greatest risk — that part wasn’t shocking.

But the surprise? Those with the lowest levels also had higher risk than those in the middle range.

For example, patients with mid-range creatinine (around 0.9 to 1.2 mg/dL) had the lowest chance of complications. But risk went up sharply below and above that zone.

That’s not the full story.

This study doesn’t prove creatinine causes these risks. But it shows it’s a stronger warning sign than we thought — especially when it’s too low.

Experts say this could change how doctors use routine blood tests. Instead of just watching for high levels, they may start paying attention to very low ones too.

It’s not just about kidney function. It’s a clue about the whole body’s resilience.

Who benefits most?

This matters most for older patients or those who are underweight after a heart attack. A low creatinine might not be “good news” — it could signal frailty.

Doctors may now look at nutrition, muscle strength, and overall health more closely — not just kidney numbers.

The hidden risk in plain sight

Creatinine is checked in almost every hospital blood panel. It’s cheap, fast, and routine. But this study shows we’ve been reading it too simply.

It’s not just a kidney marker. It might be a mirror of overall health — showing both organ stress and body weakness.

This study looked back at past records. It can’t prove creatinine causes the risks — only that they’re linked.

Also, all patients had heart attacks and stents. Results might not apply to healthier people.

And creatinine isn’t perfect. Muscle mass, age, and sex affect levels. A fit young man will naturally have higher creatinine than an older woman — not because his kidneys are worse.

Doctors may start using creatinine differently — watching both ends of the scale. Future research could test whether improving nutrition or strength in low-creatinine patients lowers their risk.

For now, this isn’t a new treatment. But it’s a new way to see an old number — one that could help protect more heart patients in the future.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background and aimsTo evaluate the correlation between creatinine (Cre) level and the risk of three kinds of adverse events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to clarify its potential correlation threshold and independent predictive value.Methods and resultsThis investigation was designed as a retrospective cohort analysis, encompassing 3, 878 individuals diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction who received PCI between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes were three types of adverse events that occurred post-procedure. To explore the relationship between Cre levels and the outcome measures, a restricted cubic spline model was employed, while the Cox proportional hazards regression model assessed the independent predictive significance. There were 996 instances (25.7%) of adverse events reported. The evaluation using a restricted cubic spline model revealed a notable J-shaped relationship between creatinine levels and the likelihood of three types of adverse events following PCI (nonlinear P 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.