Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis reports diabetes-related foot disease incidence from two large cohortsDiabetes foot disease rates vary wildly between UK and China populations

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret DFD incidence estimates as descriptive summaries given high heterogeneity across populations.

This meta-analysis pooled data from two large cohorts—UK Biobank and Chongqing Diabetes Registry (CDR)—to estimate the incidence of diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) and its components among patients with diabetes who were free of DFD at baseline. The primary outcome was incidence of overall and individual DFD components.

Overall DFD incidence was 12.81 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI: 12.46-13.15) in UK Biobank and 24.97 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI: 21.38-28.99) in CDR. Pooled estimates for specific components included peripheral neuropathy (19.84 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI: 16.58-23.10), foot ulcer (7.32 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI: 6.17-8.47), lower-extremity amputation (2.56 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI: 2.20-2.93), lower-extremity arterial disease (2.56 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI: 1.08-4.04), and gangrene (0.81 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI: 0.00-1.74).

The authors caution that high heterogeneity across studies (I>99%) means these estimates should be interpreted as descriptive summaries rather than a single universal incidence. The context-specific nature of DFD occurrence is underscored by the large heterogeneity. No data on interventions, comparators, or safety outcomes were reported.

Clinicians should recognize that DFD incidence varies substantially across populations. These pooled estimates provide a general benchmark but may not apply directly to individual practice settings due to the high heterogeneity.

People with diabetes worry about losing their feet. This fear is real. A recent look at data from the UK and China shows how often these serious problems happen. The numbers are not the same everywhere.

In the UK Biobank, about 13 out of every 1,000 people developed foot disease each year. In the Chongqing Diabetes Registry in China, that number jumped to nearly 25 out of 1,000 people per year. The risk of foot ulcers was also higher in the Chinese group.

These differences matter. They suggest that where you live changes your risk. The study calls these numbers descriptive summaries. They are not a single universal rule for everyone. High differences between the groups make it hard to draw one big conclusion.

Doctors need to know that foot disease rates depend on the local setting. Patients should talk to their care team about their specific risk factors. This analysis helps explain why some places see more foot problems than others.

What this means for you:
Diabetes foot disease rates vary greatly between the UK and China populations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
We aimed to estimate the incidence for overall and individual components of diabetes-related foot disease (DFD), and explore potential heterogeneity across studies. We included patients with diabetes who were free of DFD from UK Biobank and Chongqing Diabetes Registry (CDR). We defined DFD according to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot 2023 criteria. We further performed meta-analyses by integrating results from the two cohorts and 64 cohorts identified from a systematic review of literature, and quantifying the extent of variation in reported incidence rates. The incidence of DFD was 12.81 (95 % confidence interval[CI]: 12.46-13.15) and 24.97 (21.38-28.99) per 1,000 person-year in UK Biobank and CDR, respectively. The pooled estimates were 19.84 (95 %CI: 16.58-23.10) for peripheral neuropathy, 7.32 (6.17-8.47) for foot ulcer, 2.56 (2.20-2.93) for lower-extremity amputation, 2.56 (1.08-4.04) for lower-extremity arterial disease, and 0.81 (0.00-1.74) for gangrene, respectively. Heterogeneity was high across studies (I > 99 %). In conclusion, incidence for DFD exceeds 10 per 1,000 person-year among patients with diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy and foot ulcer are major contributors to incident DFD. These estimates should be interpreted as descriptive summaries of available evidence rather than a single universal incidence, and large heterogeneity underscores the context-specific nature of DFD occurrence.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.