Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds water-only fasting decreases HDL, increases LDL and total cholesterol

Meta-analysis finds water-only fasting decreases HDL, increases LDL and total cholesterol
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret water-only fasting lipid changes cautiously due to publication bias and association-only evidence.

A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 32 human studies examining the effects of water-only fasting on blood lipid profiles. The analysis compared pre-fasting measurements with post-fasting measurements across various study durations, though specific follow-up periods were not consistently reported. The population included human participants from studies investigating water-only fasting protocols.

The meta-analysis found water-only fasting produced lipid-specific adaptations. HDL decreased significantly overall (Hedges' g = -0.233). LDL increased significantly (Hedges' g = 0.489), and total cholesterol increased (Hedges' g = 0.343). Triglycerides showed no significant overall effect (Hedges' g = -0.039), and VLDL demonstrated small, non-significant changes (Hedges' g = 0.203). Absolute numerical changes and confidence intervals were not reported for these effect sizes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported across the included studies. Key limitations include detected publication bias for LDL and total cholesterol outcomes, and substantial heterogeneity with limited data for VLDL measurements. The analysis notes these findings represent associations from pre-post comparisons rather than causal evidence from controlled trials.

For clinical practice, these findings suggest water-only fasting is associated with mixed lipid changes that may not align with conventional cardiovascular risk reduction targets. The evidence does not support inferring clinical outcomes from these lipid parameter changes, nor does it establish the safety or risks of water-only fasting protocols. More rigorously controlled, longer-term clinical trials are needed to understand the clinical implications of these lipid adaptations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Water-only fasting is practiced for metabolic and therapeutic purposes, yet its specific effects on lipid fractions remain inconsistently reported. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated lipid responses to water-only fasting across varying durations and fasting protocols. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000–2025) were searched for human studies reporting pre–post lipid measurements under water-only fasting. Thirty-two studies met eligibility criteria. Effect sizes were calculated as Hedges’ g using random-effects models. Duration-dependent responses were evaluated through subgroup analyses (≤3 days, >3 days) and piecewise threshold meta-regression. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger’s tests. Water-only fasting produced lipid-specific and duration-dependent adaptations. HDL decreased significantly overall (g = −0.233), with no change in ≤3-day fasts but clear reductions in >3-day fasts; threshold analysis identified an early decline within the first ~3 days. LDL increased significantly (g = 0.489) and across all duration subgroups, showing a biphasic trajectory with progressive elevation up to ~10 days followed by attenuation or partial reversal. Total cholesterol also increased (g = 0.343), with the largest effects in >3–-day fasts and a nonlinear threshold at ~5 days marking stabilization or modest decline thereafter. Triglycerides showed no significant overall effect (g = −0.039), characterized by reductions in ≤3-day fasts, increases in >3-day fasts; a marked early-phase threshold was observed at ~2.5 days. VLDL exhibited small, non-significant changes (g = 0.203) with substantial heterogeneity and limited data. Evidence of publication bias was detected for LDL and total cholesterol but not for HDL, triglycerides, or VLDL. Water-only fasting induces distinct, duration-dependent lipid adaptations. LDL and total cholesterol demonstrate early increases followed by stabilization, HDL decreases mainly during multi-day fasts, while triglycerides and VLDL show no uniform pattern. These findings highlight the importance of considering fasting duration when evaluating cardiometabolic effects and underscore the need for rigorously controlled, longer-term clinical trials.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.