Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Yaobitong capsules improve pain and function in lumbar disc herniation: meta-analysis

Yaobitong capsules improve pain and function in lumbar disc herniation: meta-analysis
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider yaobitong capsules as an adjunct to standard therapy for lumbar disc herniation, but note limited generalizability from Chinese trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of yaobitong (YBT) capsules for lumbar disc herniation. The analysis included 1,752 patients from trials conducted in China, comparing YBT capsules alone or in combination with standard pharmacological therapy versus standard therapy alone.

Key findings showed significant improvements in pain and function. The pooled mean difference for VAS was -1.37 (95% CI: -1.60 to -1.14), for ODI was -5.36 (95% CI: -6.56 to -4.16), and for JOA scores was 5.21 (95% CI: 3.66 to 6.75). Inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α) were also significantly reduced. Adverse events were less frequent in the YBT group (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.67), with a favorable short-term safety profile.

The authors noted limitations: most trials were small, single-center studies conducted in China, which may limit generalizability. Long-term safety and clinical utility were not established. The review supports YBT capsules as a potentially effective adjunct to conventional therapy, but further high-quality, multicenter trials are needed.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundLumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a major contributor to the global burden of low back pain. Yaobitong (YBT) capsules are a commercial Chinese polyherbal preparation that has been widely used to treat LDH. However, its efficacy and safety require comprehensive evaluation.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases, retrieving literature from the inception of each database up to 31 October 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating YBT alone or in combination with standard pharmacological therapy were included. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored outcome stability. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, Egger’s test, and Begg’s rank correlation test. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, and evidence certainty was graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and R software.ResultsSeventeen RCTs involving 1,752 patients with LDH were included. Compared with standard pharmacological therapy, YBT capsules significantly improved VAS (MD = −1.37, 95% CI: −1.60 to −1.14), ODI (MD = −5.36, 95% CI: −6.56 to −4.16), and JOA scores (MD = 5.21, 95% CI: 3.66–6.75). Additionally, YBT capsules significantly reduced levels of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, supporting potential anti-inflammatory effects. Adverse events were mild and less frequent in the YBT capsules group (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18–0.67). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results across varying sample sizes, treatment periods, and regimens, supporting the robustness of the study findings.ConclusionYBT capsule-based therapy was associated with reduced pain, improved functional outcomes, and suppressed inflammatory responses in LDH, while exhibiting a favorable short-term safety profile. These findings support YBT capsules as a potentially effective adjunct to conventional therapy. However, most trials were small, single-center studies conducted in China. Large-scale, multicenter RCTs with standardized outcomes are needed to confirm long-term safety and clinical utility.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251232067, identifier CRD420251232067.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.