Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Intra-arterial alteplase and tenecteplase improve excellent functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for strokeAdding certain clot-busting drugs improves outcomes for stroke patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider IAT with 0.225 mg/kg alteplase or 0.125 mg/kg tenecteplase to improve excellent functional outcomes in AIS-LVO.

This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) using different doses of alteplase and tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion following successful endovascular thrombectomy. The analysis included 2,131 patients to compare IAT against EVT alone.

The study found that both EVT plus 0.225 mg/kg alteplase and EVT plus 0.125 mg/kg tenecteplase significantly improved excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1) compared to EVT alone, with odds ratios of 1.95 and 1.91 respectively. While no statistically significant differences were found for other primary outcomes like favorable outcome or functional independence, the SUCRA analysis ranked different doses highest for specific metrics.

Safety data indicated that IAT with 0.0625 mg/kg tenecteplase was associated with a significantly higher risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (OR 1.53). The authors noted that not all IAT strategies showed statistically significant efficacy across all outcomes. Clinically, EVT plus 0.225 mg/kg alteplase may provide broader functional benefits with a lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to some tenecteplase alternatives.

How this fits prior evidence

This network meta-analysis addresses the gap left by the previously reported trial protocol for intra-arterial alteplase, which lacked clinical outcome data. It also contributes to the evidence regarding tenecteplase; while prior findings indicated no significant difference in serious adverse event distribution between tenecteplase and alteplase, this analysis specifically identifies a higher risk of any intracranial hemorrhage with 0.0625 mg/kg tenecteplase.

When a person suffers a major stroke caused by a large blockage in a main artery, every second counts. Doctors often use a procedure called endovascular thrombectomy to physically remove the clot. However, new data suggests that adding certain clot-busting medications—called intra-arterial thrombolysis—can further improve the chances of a patient regaining their independence.

A large review of over 2,000 patients found that combining the mechanical procedure with specific doses of alteplase or tenecteplase led to significantly better functional outcomes. These are cases where patients achieved an excellent recovery, meaning they could move and speak well after 90 days. While both medications showed promise for these high-level recoveries, some differences appeared in safety.

Not all combinations were equal. For example, a specific lower dose of tenecteplase was linked to a higher risk of brain bleeding. Because this study analyzed data from multiple sources rather than one single trial, the results are not yet definitive. Doctors will need more head-to-head trials to confirm exactly which combination is safest and most effective for every individual patient.

What this means for you:
Adding specific clot-busting drugs to mechanical surgery can improve recovery for patients with severe strokes.

Common questions

Does adding medication improve recovery after a stroke?

Yes, the study found that combining mechanical treatment with 0.225 mg/kg of alteplase or 0.125 mg/kg of tenecteplase significantly improved excellent functional outcomes for patients with large-vessel strokes.

Are there any risks to using these medications?

There are safety concerns regarding bleeding. Specifically, a lower dose of tenecteplase (0.0625 mg/kg) was associated with a significantly higher risk of any intracranial hemorrhage, which is bleeding inside the skull.

How do these treatments compare to surgery alone?

While both alteplase and tenecteplase showed significant improvements over surgery alone for excellent outcomes, some specific doses did not show statistically significant differences in other areas like overall mortality or average functional independence.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), but incomplete microvascular reperfusion often limits recovery. The 2026 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline suggests that adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) may be considered after successful EVT to target residual microthrombi, yet the comparative efficacy and safety of different IAT strategies remain unclear. This study therefore compared the efficacy and safety of various IAT strategies following successful EVT in AIS-LVO.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from their inception through 26 February 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EVT alone or with IAT. A Bayesian network meta-analysis using a fixed-effects model was conducted.ResultsSeven RCTs including 2,131 patients were analyzed. Compared with EVT alone, EVT + 0.225 mg/kg alteplase (ALT) or 0.125 mg/kg tenecteplase (TNK) significantly improved excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) (OR 1.95, 95% CrI 1.32–2.89; OR 1.91, 95% CrI 1.12–3.27), while EVT + 0.0625 mg/kg TNK was associated with a significantly higher risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) (OR 1.53, 95% CrI 1.13–2.07). No statistically significant differences were observed for functional independence (mRS 0–2), favorable outcome (mRS 0–3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or 90 day mortality. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that EVT + 0.225 mg/kg ALT ranked highest for functional independence (mRS 0–2), but also ranked higher for the risk of 90 day mortality. In contrast, EVT + 0.0625 mg/kg TNK ranked highest for favorable outcome (mRS 0–3), while also ranking highest for the risk of sICH and aICH.ConclusionNot all IAT strategies showed statistically significant efficacy, but EVT + 0.225 mg/kg ALT or 0.125 mg/kg TNK significantly improved excellent functional outcomes. SUCRAs suggested that EVT + 0.225 mg/kg ALT may provide broader functional benefits with a lower risk of sICH. Further confirmation in head-to-head RCTs is warranted.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251250195, identifier CRD420251250195.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.