Systematic review finds no benefit of higher-dose fluvoxamine for preventing deterioration in mild-moderate COVID-19
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of higher-dose fluvoxamine (2 x 100 mg/day) compared with placebo for preventing disease deterioration in adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Seven studies were identified as RCTs, though one was eventually classified as non-randomized due to severe bias, including unreported standard of care and huge attrition. Six trials remained placebo-controlled.
The pooled analysis of composite deterioration showed no benefit, with an odds ratio of 0.78 (95% CrI 0.55 - 1.21). Multiplicity correction yielded an OR of 0.87 (0.64 - 1.21). Subgroup analyses for hospitalizations across small trials (OR = 0.88, 95% CrI 0.45 - 1.72), large trials (OR = 0.94, 95% CrI 0.52 - 1.75), and all trials combined (OR = 0.81, 95% CrI 0.47 - 1.43) also indicated no benefit.
The authors note that heterogeneity was unlikely due to clinical factors like vaccination status but more likely due to unidentified bias. Composite endpoints were susceptible to error. Safety data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported. Given these limitations and the lack of demonstrated efficacy, the practice relevance remains uncertain.