Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Astragaloside IV significantly reduces renal fibrosis markers and serum creatinine in preclinical animal modelsAstragaloside IV Shows Potential for Treating Chronic Kidney Disease

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that Astragaloside IV reduces renal fibrosis markers in animal models, but results are limited by study quality.

This meta-analysis synthesizes preclinical data from 769 animals to evaluate the effects of Astragaloside IV on chronic kidney disease and renal fibrosis. The analysis indicates that Astragaloside IV significantly reduced serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) with a p-value of less than 0.0001. Additionally, proteinuria was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001).

The study also evaluated markers of renal fibrosis. Significant reductions (P < 0.0001) were observed in transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), fibronectin, and alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA). These findings suggest that Astragaloside IV may mitigate markers associated with renal fibrosis in animal models.

Several limitations were noted, including suboptimal methodological quality of the included studies and considerable statistical heterogeneity. Furthermore, publication bias cannot be definitively excluded. Because these findings are based on preclinical animal models rather than human clinical trials, the clinical application of Astragaloside IV for human chronic kidney disease remains unproven and requires cautious interpretation.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in the understanding of pharmacological interventions for renal fibrosis. While prior evidence highlights that high abdominal aortic calcification index predicts poorer outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease, this study explores the potential of Astragaloside IV to reduce markers of renal fibrosis and improve serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen in animal models. However, as these are preclinical results, they do not currently offer a confirmed clinical treatment for human patients.

This study is a meta-analysis of preclinical research, meaning the findings are based on tests conducted in animals rather than in humans. Because these results come from animal models and the original studies had some quality issues, the findings should be viewed with caution and are not yet ready to guide human medical treatments.

Researchers looked at data from 769 animals to see how Astragaloside IV affected chronic kidney disease and renal fibrosis. The results showed that the treatment significantly reduced several markers of kidney damage, including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and proteinuria. It also lowered levels of specific proteins and markers associated with scarring in the kidneys.

While these results are promising in a laboratory setting, they do not prove that the treatment is safe or effective for people. The study also noted that the data was inconsistent across different reports. You should talk to your doctor about any concerns regarding kidney health or new treatments.

What this means for you:
Early animal studies show Astragaloside IV may reduce kidney damage markers, but human trials are still needed.

Common questions

Is Astragaloside IV safe for people with kidney disease?

The current evidence is based only on animal models, not on human clinical trials. Because the study was preclinical and involved 769 animals, it does not provide information on human safety or effectiveness. You must consult a medical professional before considering any new supplements or treatments.

What specific markers of kidney damage did the study find?

The study found that Astragaloside IV significantly reduced several markers in animal models, including serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and proteinuria. It also reduced markers of fibrosis like TGF-beta1, fibronectin, and alpha-smooth muscle actin.

How reliable are these findings for human patients?

The results should be interpreted with caution. The study noted that the included research had some methodological flaws and high variability. Because these are preclinical results from animal models, they are not yet used to change standard medical practices for humans.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundRenal fibrosis is the principal pathological hallmark of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the clinical availability of effective, targeted anti-fibrotic therapeutics remains severely constrained. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV), a predominant bioactive metabolite isolated from Astragali Radix, has exhibited substantial renoprotective and anti-fibrotic properties in diverse preclinical models.Materials and MethodsWe systematically searched eight electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and Wanfang Data) from inception to 30 November 2025, to identify relevant in vivo studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 18.0.ResultsA total of 34 studies involving 769 animals were included. Compared with the control group, AS-IV treatment significantly reduced the levels of serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), proteinuria, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), fibronectin, and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (all P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed that intragastric dose was a source of heterogeneity for Scr; publication year for BUN; treatment duration for TGF-β1; and the underlying animal disease model alongside treatment duration for α-SMA. Dose-response analyses revealed that Scr, BUN, TGF-β1, fibronectin, and α-SMA showed overall negative dose-dependent trends. In addition, AS-IV significantly modulated the expression of other indicators related to fibrosis, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses. Methodologically, the overall quality of the included studies was suboptimal, and there was considerable statistical heterogeneity. Additionally, the presence of publication bias cannot be definitively excluded. These results suggest that AS-IV holds renoprotective potential in animal models of renal fibrosis; however, these results should be interpreted prudently.ConclusionThis study provides the first systematic review evaluating AS-IV across etiologically diverse models of renal fibrosis, showing its broad-spectrum anti-fibrotic pharmacological effects. The synthesized evidence suggests that these renoprotective effects may be mediated through multi-target modulation, including mitigating inflammation and oxidative stress, modulating autophagy and apoptosis, and reducing extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation. Nevertheless, given the significant heterogeneity and overall suboptimal methodological quality of the included studies, these positive findings should be interpreted with caution.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261372263, identifier CRD420261372263.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.