Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Jordan guideline review highlights SGLT2 inhibitor access barriers for heart failure patients

Jordan guideline review highlights SGLT2 inhibitor access barriers for heart failure patients
Photo by Pharmacy Images / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider policy interventions and updated reimbursement structures to improve SGLT2 inhibitor access for heart failure.

This mixed-methods study and guideline analysis surveyed 312 physicians in Jordan, comprising 214 treating physicians and 98 insurance physicians, regarding prescribing decisions and insurance authorization processes for SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure. The setting was Jordan, focusing on general practitioners, family medicine, internal medicine, and insurance physicians. The study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and initiation rates alongside insurance approval patterns.

Key findings reveal that misclassification of SGLT2 inhibitors as diabetes-only medications is prevalent among insurance physicians. This misclassification was the strongest predictor of rejection, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.18 (95% CI 0.10–0.33). Consistent insurance approval for heart failure without diabetes occurred in fewer than one-third of cases. Conversely, knowledge and attitudes toward SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure were characterized as moderate-to-good and favorable.

Initiation rates for these medications were reported as low. The authors note that while knowledge is adequate, structural barriers persist. The study does not report specific adverse events, tolerability, or discontinuations. Practice relevance is framed around the need for policy interventions, updating reimbursement structures, standardizing criteria, and involving stakeholders to improve access for patients.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundSodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are now cornerstone therapy for heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum, independent of diabetes status. Despite strong guideline recommendations, real-world uptake remains suboptimal, especially in middle-income settings. Evidence on the interplay between prescribing decisions and insurance authorization processes is limited.ObjectivesTo explore knowledge, attitudes, prescribing practices, and authorization decision-making related to SGLT2 inhibitors for HF among treating physicians and insurance physicians in Jordan, and to identify system-level barriers to evidence-based use.MethodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among treating physicians (general practitioners, family medicine, internal medicine) and insurance physicians involved in medication authorization. The validated questionnaire was analyzed with descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Semi-structured interviews followed with a purposive sample; reflexive thematic analysis was applied. Findings were integrated using joint displays.ResultsOf 312 physicians surveyed (214 treating, 98 insurance), treating physicians showed moderate-to-good knowledge and favorable attitudes toward SGLT2 inhibitors in HF, yet initiation rates were low. Consistent insurance approval for HF without diabetes occurred in fewer than one-third of cases. Misclassification of SGLT2 inhibitors as diabetes-only medications was prevalent among insurance physicians (61.2%) and the strongest predictor of rejection (adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10–0.33). Lack of guideline-aligned protocols and non-cardiologist prescriber status further reduced approval. Qualitative data highlighted drug-class identity, professional hierarchies, cost accountability, and defensive decision-making as key influences. Integrated findings showed system-level factors overriding physician knowledge and intent.ConclusionBarriers to SGLT2 inhibitor use for HF in Jordan are predominantly systemic. Misclassification and misalignment between evidence and insurance frameworks hinder guideline-directed care. Policy interventions, updating reimbursement structures, standardizing criteria, and involving stakeholders, are essential to improve access.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.