Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Vietnamese pharmacogenetic variant frequencies differ from East Asian superpopulations in key drug metabolism genesVietnamese Genetic Profiles Differ From General East Asian Data

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that Vietnamese pharmacogenetic frequencies are distinct from general East Asian references for key metabolism genes.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the frequency of pharmacogenetic variants, including rsIDs, star alleles, and haplotypes, within a Vietnamese population. The study compares these frequencies against the 1,000 Genomes East Asian (EAS) superpopulation to identify regional genetic nuances.

Key findings include high frequencies for VKORC1 -1639G>A (89.91%) and VKORC1 1173C>T (85.43%), as well as SLCO1B1 c.388A>G (75.95%) and CYP3A5*3 (60.81%). Other noted variants include ABCB1 3435C>T (40.28%), ABCG2 c.421C>A (36.00%), and CYP2C19*2 (27.90%). Notably, the frequency of ABCB1 3435C>T was 19.9 points lower than the EAS superpopulation, and CYP3A5*3 was 7.2 points lower than the EAS superpopulation.

The authors note that while Vietnamese pharmacogenomic frequencies are regionally East Asian-adjacent, they are not interchangeable with a generic East Asian reference. Clinicians should consider these specific regional differences when interpreting pharmacogenetic data for patients of Vietnamese descent, as general East Asian data may not accurately reflect local genetic profiles.

Researchers analyzed genetic variations in a Vietnamese population to see how they compare to broader East Asian groups. They looked at specific genes that can affect how the body processes certain medications. The study focused on identifying the frequency of these genetic markers within the local population.

The results showed that while the Vietnamese population shares many similarities with other East Asian groups, there are specific differences. For example, the frequency of certain variants, such as ABCB1 3435C>T and CYP3A5*3, were lower in the Vietnamese group compared to the general East Asian average. These variations are important because they can influence how a person responds to medicine.

Because of these differences, the study suggests that Vietnamese patients may have unique responses to certain drugs. The findings indicate that using a general East Asian average might not be accurate enough for patients in Vietnam. Doctors can use this information to better understand how local genetics might influence treatment plans for their patients.

What this means for you:
Vietnamese people have unique genetic markers that differ from general East Asian averages for some medications.

Common questions

How do these genetic findings affect medication?

The study looked at genes like VKORC1 and CYP3A5, which can influence how the body processes certain drugs. Because the Vietnamese population has specific frequencies of these variants, it means their response to some medications might differ from the average East Asian person.

Are the results for Vietnamese people different from other East Asians?

Yes, the study found that Vietnamese genetic frequencies are not the same as general East Asian averages. Specifically, the frequencies of ABCB1 3435C>T and CYP3A5*3 were lower in the Vietnamese group compared to the East Asian superpopulation.

What does this mean for local healthcare?

The study suggests that because Vietnamese genetic profiles are unique, they should not be treated as identical to general East Asian data. This helps doctors understand that local genetic factors may play a role in how patients respond to their specific treatments.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundPopulation-frequency evidence is indispensable for planning pharmacogenomic services, but broad ancestry categories do not reliably capture the distribution of clinically important alleles, haplotypes, and structural variants. We undertook a systematic synthesis of pharmacogenetic variation reported in Vietnamese populations and evaluated its relevance to clinical implementation.MethodsFollowing a prospectively registered protocol and PRISMA 2020, we searched international and Vietnamese sources through 30 December 2025. Reports were eligible when they described Vietnamese participants and provided, or materially informed, pharmacogenetic genotype or allele-frequency evidence. Variant representations were reconciled across rsIDs, star alleles, haplotypes, copy-number changes, hybrid alleles, repeats, and HLA alleles. For variants with at least two independent rows, frequencies were synthesized with random-effects logit models; single-row estimates used Wilson confidence intervals. Orientation-validated single-rsID variants were compared with the 1,000 Genomes AFR, AMR, EAS, EUR, and SAS superpopulations with false-discovery-rate control.ResultsOf 207 records, 54 full-text reports were assessed and 52 were retained in the systematic review; 46 independent reports or datasets contributed to the primary meta-analysis. The evidence comprised 108 analysis-ready variant representations across 25 pharmacogenes, including 66 single-rsID and 42 complex or non-rsID representations. Ninety-five representations were supported by one study row. Among included reports, 11 were at low, 38 at moderate, and 3 at high risk of bias; none of the 46 quantitative reports was classified as high risk. Prominent estimates were VKORC1 -1639G>A, 89.91% (95% CI 81.13-94.86); VKORC1 1173C>T, 85.43% (81.61-88.56); SLCO1B1 c.388A>G, 75.95% (69.75-81.22); CYP3A5*3, 60.81% (44.96-74.67); ABCB1 3435C>T, 40.28% (32.62-48.44); ABCG2 c.421C>A, 36.00% (29.67-42.86); CYP2C19*2, 27.90% (26.57-29.27); NAT2*6, 27.00% (18.69-37.31); and CYP2C19*3, 5.74% (4.82-6.82). Eighteen of 20 variants in the principal global comparison were within 5 percentage points of EAS; larger differences occurred for ABCB1 3435C>T (−19.9 points) and CYP3A5*3 (−7.2 points).ConclusionVietnamese pharmacogenomic frequencies are regionally East Asian-adjacent but not interchangeable with a generic East Asian reference. Implementation should combine local frequency evidence with guideline strength, preventable clinical harm, medication use, and assay complexity, while preserving haplotype and structural-variant information.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7VTNW, identifier 7VTNW.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.