Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Dydrogesterone vs micronized progesterone for ongoing pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer

Dydrogesterone vs micronized progesterone for ongoing pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that dydrogesterone may have a lower ongoing pregnancy rate than micronized progesterone in frozen embryo transfer, but the difference was not significant.

This pilot prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 150 women undergoing artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer (AC-FET) at a single centre. Participants were randomized to receive either dydrogesterone or micronized vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support.

The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR). The OPR was 31.5% with dydrogesterone versus 45.2% with micronized vaginal progesterone, representing an absolute difference of -13%. This result was not statistically significant (p=0.09; 95% CI -38 to 12).

Regarding safety, local side effects were reported as common with micronized vaginal progesterone. Serious adverse events were not reported. Four women switched luteal phase support post-randomization.

Key limitations include the pilot nature of the study, the lack of statistically significant results, and the need for larger studies. The practice relevance is that results may have clinical implications and highlight the need for larger studies investigating the ideal dose and administration route of different luteal phase support medications in AC-FET cycles.

The evidence is preliminary and does not establish superiority of either intervention. The findings should not be overinterpreted given the non-significant p-value and wide confidence interval.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The introduction of vitrification has markedly increased frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, driving efforts to optimize FET protocols. In artificial-cycle FET (AC-FET), micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) is widely used for luteal phase support (LPS), though local side effects are common. Dydrogesterone (DYD), an oral selective progesterone receptor agonist, offers patient-friendly administration, but its efficacy in AC-FET remains uncertain. In this single-centre trial (October 2021 - September 2023), women Of 167 screened, 150 were randomized (Group A: 73; Group B: 77). Baseline and cycle characteristics were comparable. Four women switched LPS post-randomization; both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were performed. OPR was 31·5% with DYD vs 45·2% with MVP (p=0·09; difference −13%, 95% CI −38 to 12). ITT analysis was consistent (31·1% vs 44·7%). Although not statistically significant, the results of this pilot prospective randomized controlled trial may have clinical implications and highlight the need for larger studies investigating the ideal dose and administration route of different LPS medications in AC-FET cycles. Given the differences in pharmacological profiles, varying dosages and more frequent administration of DYD may also warrant exploration.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.