Dydrogesterone vs micronized progesterone for ongoing pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer
This pilot prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 150 women undergoing artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer (AC-FET) at a single centre. Participants were randomized to receive either dydrogesterone or micronized vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support.
The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR). The OPR was 31.5% with dydrogesterone versus 45.2% with micronized vaginal progesterone, representing an absolute difference of -13%. This result was not statistically significant (p=0.09; 95% CI -38 to 12).
Regarding safety, local side effects were reported as common with micronized vaginal progesterone. Serious adverse events were not reported. Four women switched luteal phase support post-randomization.
Key limitations include the pilot nature of the study, the lack of statistically significant results, and the need for larger studies. The practice relevance is that results may have clinical implications and highlight the need for larger studies investigating the ideal dose and administration route of different luteal phase support medications in AC-FET cycles.
The evidence is preliminary and does not establish superiority of either intervention. The findings should not be overinterpreted given the non-significant p-value and wide confidence interval.