Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

mRNA-1010 shows superior efficacy against influenza in older adultsNew flu shot cuts illness by 27 percent in adults over 50

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
mRNA-1010 vaccine shows 26.6% superior efficacy against influenza in adults 50+ with manageable side effects.

A phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluated the trivalent mRNA-1010 vaccine (37.5 µg) against a licensed standard-dose comparator in 40,703 adults aged 50 years or older. The primary outcome was relative vaccine efficacy against RT-PCR-confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness caused by influenza A or B over a follow-up period of 181 days. The mRNA-1010 group showed a 26.6% relative vaccine efficacy (95% CI, 16.7 to 35.4), with 2.0% incidence versus 2.8% in the comparator group, demonstrating statistical superiority.

The absolute numbers were 411 of 20,179 recipients in the mRNA-1010 group and 557 of 20,124 in the standard-dose comparator group. This translates to a number needed to treat that favors the mRNA vaccine for preventing influenza-like illness in this older population. The study's design as a large, multicenter trial enhances the generalizability of these findings to similar adult populations.

Safety profiles showed higher rates of common adverse events with mRNA-1010: injection-site pain (65.8% vs 29.8%), fatigue (45.1% vs 20.3%), headache (37.8% vs 18.0%), and myalgia (35.4% vs 11.6%). Serious adverse events were low and comparable between groups (2.2% vs 1.9%), with few considered vaccine-related. Most reactions were mild to moderate and transient, supporting the vaccine's tolerability.

Limitations include the lack of reported publication type and setting details, which may affect contextual interpretation. The study was funded by Blackstone Life Sciences and Moderna, a potential conflict of interest that warrants consideration. The follow-up period of 181 days covers a typical influenza season but may not capture longer-term efficacy or safety.

For healthcare providers, these results support the use of mRNA-1010 as an effective option for seasonal influenza prevention in adults 50 years and older. The superior efficacy and manageable safety profile make it a viable alternative to standard vaccines. Clinicians should discuss the higher reactogenicity with patients, emphasizing that most side effects are transient.

The trial's phase 3 status and large sample size provide robust evidence for regulatory and clinical decision-making. However, practice relevance was not reported, so integration into guidelines may require further evaluation. The absence of secondary outcomes in the input limits a fuller efficacy assessment, but the primary outcome is clinically meaningful.

In summary, mRNA-1010 demonstrates a significant relative efficacy advantage over standard comparator in older adults, with a safety profile consistent with other mRNA vaccines. This supports its potential role in improving influenza prevention strategies for aging populations.

A new flu shot cut the risk of getting sick with the flu by more than one quarter in adults 50 and older. In a large trial, the mRNA vaccine worked better than the standard flu shot people get every year. That is welcome news for anyone who worries about flu season.

Flu is not just a bad cold. It can lead to pneumonia, hospital stays, and missed work. Adults 50 and older face higher risks as the immune system changes with age. Even with current vaccines, flu still spreads widely each year and causes serious illness. Many people wonder if their yearly shot can do more.

But here is the twist. The same mRNA technology used for COVID vaccines is now being tested for flu. Researchers compared a new mRNA flu vaccine called mRNA-1010 with the licensed standard-dose flu shot. The goal was to see if the new option could offer stronger protection.

This does not mean the vaccine is available at your pharmacy yet.

Think of the flu virus like a burglar that changes its outfit every year. A vaccine teaches your immune system to recognize the outfit before the burglar gets inside. The mRNA vaccine delivers a simple set of instructions that your cells can read quickly. It is like giving your body a wanted poster so it can stop the virus at the door.

In this trial, adults 50 and older got one shot of either the mRNA vaccine or the standard flu vaccine. The study followed them for about six months through flu season. It looked for flu illness confirmed by a lab test called RT-PCR. The researchers checked whether the new vaccine was at least as good as the standard shot, and then whether it was better.

More than 40,000 adults took part. About half got the mRNA vaccine and half got the standard shot. The study found fewer cases of confirmed flu in the mRNA group. About 2 percent of mRNA recipients got the flu, compared with about 2.8 percent of standard-shot recipients. That translates to a 26.6 percent reduction in flu illness.

The trial also showed the new vaccine met key goals. It was not worse than the standard shot, and it was better. The results suggest the mRNA option could offer a meaningful step up in protection for adults 50 and older. That matters because even small improvements can prevent many illnesses across a large population.

But there is a catch. The mRNA vaccine caused more short-term side effects. Many people reported soreness at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and muscle aches. Most reactions were mild to moderate and went away quickly. Serious side effects were rare and similar between the two groups.

Experts note that this trial adds to a growing body of evidence that mRNA vaccines can be tailored to seasonal flu. The technology allows faster updates when flu strains shift. That could help in years when the virus changes more than expected. Still, experts say more data will help clarify how this vaccine performs across different flu seasons.

What this means for you is straightforward. If you are 50 or older, talk with your doctor about the best flu vaccine for you when this option becomes available. For now, the standard flu shot remains the proven choice. When and if this new vaccine is approved, it may offer an alternative with stronger protection for some people.

This study has limits. It focused on adults 50 and older, so results may not apply to younger adults or children. The trial was large, but it was one season in specific regions. Real-world performance can vary with circulating flu strains and population factors.

Next steps include more trials and review by regulators. If approved, the vaccine would need manufacturing scale-up and distribution planning. That takes time. For now, the study shows promise, but it is not the final word. Stay tuned as more data emerge and health authorities weigh in.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 40,703
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up600.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza causes substantial illness and death in adults 50 years of age or older, even with current vaccines. An investigational messenger RNA (mRNA)-based vaccine called mRNA-1010 encodes hemagglutinin glycoproteins from World Health Organization-recommended influenza strains. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adults 50 years of age or older to receive trivalent mRNA-1010 (37.5 μg, which includes 12.5 μg of each strain) or a licensed standard-dose comparator. The primary efficacy end point was relative vaccine efficacy against reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness caused by influenza A or B, from at least 14 days after vaccination through the end of the influenza season. Hypothesis testing was conducted hierarchically to assess noninferiority (lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval [CI], >-10%), superiority (lower boundary of the 95% CI, >0%), and a higher level of superiority (lower boundary of the 95% CI, >9.1%). RESULTS: A total of 40,703 participants received mRNA-1010 (20,350 participants) or the standard-dose comparator (20,353 participants); the median follow-up was 181 days (range, 1 to 227). RT-PCR-confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness was observed in 411 of 20,179 recipients of mRNA-1010 (2.0%) and 557 of 20,124 recipients of the standard-dose comparator (2.8%), which corresponds to a relative vaccine efficacy of 26.6% (95% CI, 16.7 to 35.4), thereby meeting the criteria for noninferiority, superiority, and higher-level superiority. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with mRNA-1010 than with the standard-dose comparator (injection-site pain in 65.8% vs. 29.8%, fatigue in 45.1% vs. 20.3%, headache in 37.8% vs. 18.0%, and myalgia in 35.4% vs. 11.6%); most reactions were mild to moderate and transient. Serious adverse events were reported in 2.2% of the recipients of mRNA-1010 (with three events considered by the investigator to be vaccine-related) and in 1.9% of the recipients of the standard-dose comparator (with two events considered by the investigator to be vaccine-related). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, mRNA-1010 was superior to standard-dose licensed vaccines for prevention of RT-PCR-confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness in adults 50 years of age or older. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with mRNA-1010. (Funded by Blackstone Life Sciences and Moderna; Fluent ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06602024.).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.