This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the biological mechanisms of respiratory muscle dysfunction in critically ill patients. The analysis included 187 patients requiring mechanical ventilation or with sepsis, compared to 161 controls, using muscle biopsy data from intensive care settings. The study focused on differences in muscle biological parameters between these groups.
Key findings from the meta-analysis showed significant differences in diaphragmatic structure and function. Diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area was 30% smaller in patients (mean difference = -629 μm, 95% CI [-876, -382] μm). Diaphragmatic fiber force was more than two standard deviations lower (standardized mean difference = -2.49, 95% CI [-3.84, -1.14]). The proportion of type II fibers was also lower (mean difference = -1.94%, 95% CI [-3.40, -0.49]%), and ubiquitinated protein levels were higher (standardized mean difference = 2.09, 95% CI [-0.14, 4.32]).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the analysis. Important limitations include low sample size and high heterogeneity that prevented meta-analyses for extramyocellular, mitochondrial, and gene expression parameters. The authors note that standardized methodologies for assessing respiratory muscles are needed to clarify biological mechanisms and guide potential interventions.
This meta-analysis of observational biopsy data identifies associations between critical illness and specific diaphragmatic changes but cannot establish causation or test interventions. The findings provide biological context for respiratory muscle dysfunction but do not directly inform clinical management decisions.
View Original Abstract ↓
Revealing biological mechanisms leading to respiratory muscle dysfunction is essential to improve clinical outcomes in patients with critical illness. The purpose was to identify biological mechanisms associated with respiratory muscle dysfunction in patients with critical illness during mechanical ventilation or sepsis. Six databases were electronically searched from inception to January 2025, examining studies with muscle biopsies. Screening, data collection, and risk-of-bias were conducted in duplicate by two independent assessors. Meta-analysis was performed to determine differences in muscle biological parameters of patients with critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation compared with controls. From 22,036 titles screened, eight studies ( = 187 patients and = 161 controls) published between 2000 and 2024 met eligibility criteria. Muscle biopsies were taken between and in the intensive care unit from the diaphragm ( = 110; 3 studies), rectus abdominis ( = 68; 5 studies), external intercostal ( = 10; 1 study), and latissimus dorsi ( = 3; 1 study). Diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area was 30% smaller (mean difference [95% confidence interval] = -629 [-876, -382] μm), with lower proportion of type II fibers (-1.94 [-3.40, -0.49]%) compared with controls. Diaphragmatic fiber force of patients was more than two standard deviations lower (standardized mean difference = -2.49 [-3.84, -1.14]), and ubiquitinated protein levels were higher (2.09 [-0.14, 4.32]) than controls. Extramyocellular, mitochondrial, and gene expression parameters were assessed in some studies, but low sample size and high heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. In conclusion, muscle biopsies from ventilated patients revealed atrophy, contractile weakness, and proteolysis markers. Standardized methodologies assessing respiratory muscles are needed to clarify biological mechanisms leading to muscle dysfunction and to guide respiratory muscle interventions.