Researchers conducted a study to compare two different ways of teaching Basic Life Support (BLS) to 229 undergraduate nursing students. One group used the HeartCode BLS teaching model based on Miller’s pyramid, while the other group received conventional training.
The results showed that students in the new program performed better across several areas. They scored higher on theoretical knowledge tests and demonstrated better CPR skills and defibrillation techniques. Additionally, they showed improved performance in specific areas like compression depth, rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation. These students also had fewer interruptions during compressions.
At the three-month follow-up, the students who used the new model still outperformed their peers in judgment, team communication, and overall simulation scores. While the results are promising for nursing education, the study notes that more large-scale studies with longer follow-ups are needed to see how well these skills are kept over a long period of time.