Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Miller pyramid based HeartCode BLS teaching improves theoretical knowledge and CPR skills in nursing studentsNew Teaching Model Improves CPR Skills for Nursing Students

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider the Miller pyramid-based HeartCode BLS model to improve student knowledge, CPR skills, and 3-month retention.

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a HeartCode BLS teaching model structured according to Miller's pyramid compared to conventional BLS teaching among 229 undergraduate nursing students. The study assessed primary outcomes including post-training theoretical examinations, 1-week skill performance, CPR quality indicators, and 3-month high-fidelity simulation-based application abilities.

Students in the observation group (n=114) demonstrated significantly higher scores in several domains compared to the control group (n=115). Theoretical knowledge scores were 74.29 ± 9.94 versus 68.81 ± 9.33 (p < 0.001). CPR skills were 85.92 ± 8.67 versus 79.80 ± 7.56 (p < 0.001), and defibrillation skills were 85.48 ± 8.63 versus 78.86 ± 5.77 (p < 0.001). Additionally, the observation group showed a higher proportion of total compression interruptions under 30 seconds at 57.0% compared to 25.2% (p < 0.001).

At the 3-month follow-up, the intervention group outperformed the control group in emergency judgment, procedure execution, team communication, and total simulation scores (p < 0.001). Learner satisfaction was consistently higher across all domains in the observation group. No adverse events were reported.

A limitation of this study is that multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm generalizability and long-term retention. The results suggest the Miller's Pyramid-based model may offer a scalable approach for optimizing BLS education in undergraduate nursing programs.

Researchers conducted a study to compare two different ways of teaching Basic Life Support (BLS) to 229 undergraduate nursing students. One group used the HeartCode BLS teaching model based on Miller’s pyramid, while the other group received conventional training.

The results showed that students in the new program performed better across several areas. They scored higher on theoretical knowledge tests and demonstrated better CPR skills and defibrillation techniques. Additionally, they showed improved performance in specific areas like compression depth, rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation. These students also had fewer interruptions during compressions.

At the three-month follow-up, the students who used the new model still outperformed their peers in judgment, team communication, and overall simulation scores. While the results are promising for nursing education, the study notes that more large-scale studies with longer follow-ups are needed to see how well these skills are kept over a long period of time.

What this means for you:
A structured teaching model improved CPR knowledge and practical skills among nursing students in this trial.

Common questions

How did the new teaching method affect student scores?

Students using the HeartCode BLS model scored higher in theoretical knowledge (74.29 vs 68.81) and CPR skills (85.92 vs 79.80). They also showed significantly better results in defibrillation skills, which reached a score of 85.48 compared to 78.86 in the conventional group.

Did the students keep their skills after three months?

Yes, at the three-month mark, students who used the new teaching model outperformed the other group in emergency judgment, procedure execution, team communication, and overall simulation scores. However, more studies are needed to confirm long-term retention of these skills.

Were there any specific CPR techniques that improved?

The study found significantly better results for the new group in compression depth, rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation. Additionally, 57.0% of students in the new group had fewer interruptions during compressions compared to only 25.2% in the conventional group.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Basic life support (BLS) competence is a core professional skill for nursing students, yet conventional training often fails to achieve durable gains in knowledge, psychomotor performance, and clinical transfer. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Miller’s pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model compared with traditional instruction in undergraduate nursing students. In this randomized controlled trial, 229 eligible nursing students were enrolled and assigned to a control group (n = 115) or an observation group (n = 114). The observation group received a HeartCode BLS teaching model structured according to Miller’s pyramid, whereas the control group received conventional BLS teaching. Outcomes were assessed using the Kirkpatrick four-level evaluation framework, including post-training theoretical examination scores, 1-week skill performance, CPR quality indicators, 3-month high-fidelity simulation-based comprehensive application ability, and learner satisfaction. Between-group comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests, independent-samples t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA, as appropriate. Baseline characteristics and pre-training scores were comparable between groups. After training, the observation group achieved significantly higher scores than the control group in theoretical knowledge (74.29 ± 9.94 vs. 68.81 ± 9.33), CPR skills (85.92 ± 8.67 vs. 79.80 ± 7.56), and defibrillation skills (85.48 ± 8.63 vs. 78.86 ± 5.77; all p < 0.001). CPR quality indicators, including compression depth, compression rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation, were also significantly better in the observation group (all p < 0.001). A greater proportion of students in the observation group maintained total compression interruption times below 30 s (57.0% vs. 25.2%; p < 0.001). Learner satisfaction was consistently higher across all domains (all p < 0.001). At 3 months, the observation group also outperformed the control group in emergency judgment and decision-making, emergency procedure execution, team communication and collaboration, and total simulation score (all p < 0.001). A Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model was associated with significantly improved immediate learning outcomes, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and mid-term integrated clinical performance among nursing students. This theory-informed, feedback-enabled instructional strategy may offer a scalable and effective approach for optimizing BLS education in undergraduate nursing, although multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm generalizability and long-term retention.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.