Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Non-routine GRV monitoring does not increase feeding intolerance in ventilated adults

Non-routine GRV monitoring does not increase feeding intolerance in ventilated adults
Photo by Ricardo Gomez Angel / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that once-daily GRV monitoring may not increase feeding intolerance compared to 4-hourly monitoring, but the small trial limits definitive conclusions.

This randomized non-inferiority trial enrolled 52 mechanically ventilated adults receiving early enteral nutrition at a tertiary A-level hospital. Patients were assigned 1:1 to non-routine GRV monitoring (monitored once at 12 hours, then once daily) or routine 4-hourly GRV monitoring. The primary outcome was feeding intolerance.

Feeding intolerance occurred in 36.5% of the intervention group versus 21.2% in the control group, an absolute difference of 15.4% (95% CI -2.0 to +31.6; p=0.13). Competing-risk models showed no significant between-group difference (adjusted HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.62 to 2.92; p=0.45).

Exploratory analyses found that higher BMI was associated with lower feeding intolerance risk (HR 0.91 per 1-point increase; p=0.044), while higher SOFA score increased risk (HR 1.14 per 1-point increase; p=0.014). Safety and tolerability were not reported.

Limitations include the small sample size (n=52), which reduces precision, and the single-center design. The non-significant difference does not confirm non-inferiority. Clinicians should interpret these results cautiously, though the data support that less frequent GRV monitoring may not increase feeding intolerance in this population.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 52
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Patients receiving early enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit (ICU) often undergo gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring to assess feeding tolerance. Despite guidelines recommending non-routine monitoring, many ICUs continue to perform 4-hourly GRV checks, which may lead to unnecessary feeding interruptions and increased nursing workload. AIM: To explore the impact of non-routine monitoring of GRV on feeding intolerance in patients receiving early enteral nutrition. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial conducted in a tertiary A-level hospital. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation and continuous enteral nutrition were randomly assigned to an intervention group (GRV monitored once at 12 h, then once daily) or a control group (routine 4-hourly monitoring). Feeding intolerance was defined as vomiting or GRV > 200 mL. RESULTS: Each group included 52 patients. Feeding intolerance occurred in 36.5% of the intervention group versus 21.2% of controls, with an absolute difference of 15.4% (95% CI -2.0 to +31.6; p = 0.13), indicating a non-significant difference between the two groups. Competing-risk models showed no significant between-group difference (adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.92; p = 0.45). Higher BMI was associated with lower intolerance risk (HR 0.91 per 1-point increase; p = 0.044), while higher SOFA score increased risk (HR 1.14 per 1-point increase; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Reducing GRV monitoring to once daily did not increase the incidence of feeding intolerance. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings of this study support critical care nurses in reducing gastric residual volume monitoring to once daily, as this does not increase the incidence of feeding intolerance. However, attention should be paid to patients at higher risk of feeding intolerance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2000038245).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.