Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Feasibility trial protocol for ultrasonography-guided therapeutic pleural drainage in ICU patients with pleural effusion and respiratory failureA new trial protocol checks if ICU drainage helps adults with fluid buildup and breathing trouble

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note this feasibility trial protocol assesses drainage feasibility in ICU patients with pleural effusion and respiratory failure.

This study is a feasibility trial protocol involving 88 eligible patients. The population consists of adults acutely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with pleural effusion ≥ 2 cm and respiratory failure. The setting is the intensive care unit (ICU). Follow-up duration is 90 days.

The intervention involves ultrasonography-guided therapeutic pleural drainage with small-bore catheter, with repeated drainage of repeated pleural effusions during ICU stay including readmissions within 90 days. The comparator is no therapeutic pleural drainage during ICU stay within 90 days unless pre-specified escape criteria apply.

Main results are not reported because this is a protocol. The primary outcome is feasibility outcome assessing group separation, i.e., proportion of patients receiving pleural drainage in ICU within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include all-cause 90-day mortality, number of patients with one or more serious adverse events within 90 days, and absolute number of days alive without life support and out of hospital, respectively, in 90 days.

Safety and tolerability data are not reported. Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability are all not reported. Funding or conflicts are not reported. Limitations are not reported. Practice relevance is not reported. Causality is not reported. Certainty is not reported.

Imagine an adult patient in the ICU with fluid building up in their chest and struggling to breathe. This new plan looks at whether using a small tube to drain that fluid helps. The team wants to see if they can get patients to receive this drainage within 90 days of admission or readmission. They will compare this approach to patients who do not get drainage unless specific safety rules are met.

The study involves 88 eligible patients. Researchers will track how many people get the drainage and look at serious side effects. They will also count how many days patients stay alive without needing life support and outside the hospital. Safety signals are not yet reported because this is a feasibility trial, which focuses on whether the plan works before testing full benefits.

This trial is still in its early planning stage. The results will tell doctors if this method is doable and safe enough to study further. It does not yet prove that the treatment works better than standard care. The team will share honest updates as the study moves forward.

What this means for you:
This trial checks if draining lung fluid is safe and doable for ICU patients with breathing trouble.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Pleural effusions are common in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with respiratory failure. Ultrasonography-guided therapeutic pleural drainage is widely used and associated with improved oxygenation and ventilatory parameters, but no randomised clinical trial data exist. This paper outlines the protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan for the Drainage Of Pleural Effusions in the ICU (DOPE-ICU) feasibility trial. This is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel-group feasibility trial. Adults acutely admitted to the ICU with pleural effusion ≥ 2 cm and respiratory failure will be screened for inclusion. We will exclude patients with existing pleural or mediastinal drain, suspected or confirmed haemothorax, pneumothorax, empyema or pleural malignancy, coagulation deficiency or antithrombotic therapy incompatible with drainage, clinical indication for therapeutic pleural drainage and predefined severe hypoxaemic or hypercapnic respiratory failure, expected ICU stay < 24 h, pregnancy, imminent withdrawal of active therapy, or patients previously randomised in the trial. A total of 88 eligible patients will be allocated 1:1 to ultrasonography-guided therapeutic pleural drainage with small-bore catheter, with repeated drainage of repeated pleural effusions during ICU stay including readmissions within 90 days versus no therapeutic pleural drainage during ICU stay within 90 days unless pre-specified escape criteria apply. The primary outcome is a feasibility outcome assessing group separation, i.e., proportion of patients receiving pleural drainage in ICU within 90 days. Secondary clinical outcomes include all-cause 90-day mortality, number of patients with one or more serious adverse events within 90 days, and absolute number of days alive without life support and out of hospital, respectively, in 90 days. Additional secondary feasibility and process outcomes will also be investigated. Data will be compared in the intension-to-treat population using generalised linear models adjusted for the stratification variable trial site. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06709456. The DOPE-ICU feasibility trial will assess whether randomised allocation to ultrasonography-guided therapeutic pleural drainage or not in adult ICU patients with respiratory failure and pleural effusion is feasible. This will inform the design of a future large randomised clinical trial evaluating the clinical effects and safety of pleural drainage in this population.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.