Real-world hearing assessments with audiovisual tasks show greater sensitivity than traditional clinical measures
This within-subjects correlational study evaluated whether hearing assessments incorporating real-world factors provide a more accurate reflection of everyday hearing challenges compared to traditional clinical measures. The study included adults with normal hearing or mild to moderate hearing loss, though the sample size was not reported. Participants underwent a single 2–3-hour session comparing assessments incorporating visual information, assessment focus, interactive communication, and natural environments against traditional clinical measures (audiometry and self-report questionnaires).
Key findings showed that speech intelligibility and listening comprehension tasks in noise, especially those with audiovisual cues, were most sensitive to hearing difficulties. Real-time self-reports of speech understanding and listening effort strongly correlated with both objective performance and audiogram results. In contrast, retrospective self-reports were less predictive of hearing challenges. Measures of vocal effort in noise reflected perceived listening effort but did not reliably indicate hearing loss. No specific effect sizes, absolute numbers, or statistical significance values were reported for these outcomes.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study has several limitations: it was correlational in design, preventing causal conclusions; sample size and setting were not reported; and generalizability beyond the study population is uncertain. The authors suggest assessments designed to better approximate real-world listening conditions provide a more sensitive and individualized evaluation of hearing ability than traditional clinical tests alone, potentially supporting more effective and personalized interventions. However, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the study's methodological constraints.