Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis links ultra-processed food consumption to increased MASLD risk in 1.2 million participants

Meta-analysis links ultra-processed food consumption to increased MASLD risk in 1.2 million particip…
Photo by ClinicalPulse / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider preliminary evidence linking ultra-processed foods to MASLD risk, but recognize no significant association with liver cancer.

This meta-analysis pooled data from 7 prospective cohort studies involving 1,272,317 participants to examine associations between ultra-processed food consumption (defined by NOVA 4 classification) and liver outcomes. The analysis assessed long-term risk for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and primary liver cancer, though specific follow-up duration was not reported.

For MASLD, higher ultra-processed food consumption was significantly associated with increased long-term risk, with a pooled adjusted hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.58). For primary liver cancer outcomes, no statistically significant associations were found: overall primary liver cancer HR 1.21 (95% CI 0.52 to 2.79), hepatocellular carcinoma HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.45), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.50 to 2.03). Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The authors note these are preliminary findings from observational studies, representing associations rather than established causation. Key limitations include the preliminary nature of the evidence and lack of statistical significance for primary liver cancer outcomes. The findings suggest potential benefits of reducing ultra-processed food intake as part of preventive strategies, but clinical implications remain uncertain given the observational design and preliminary evidence.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,272,317
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are a major component of the Western diet, and their consumption is increasing worldwide. Although there is compelling evidence for the effects of UPF on non-communicable diseases, data on their long-term effects on liver health are limited. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase (from 2009 to September 5, 2025) for prospective cohort studies assessing the association between higher UPF consumption (defined by the NOVA 4 classification) and the risk of developing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and primary liver cancer outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with the restricted maximum likelihood estimator and Knapp-Hartung adjustment to obtain pooled adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 7 studies with a total of 1,272,317 participants. The highest UPF consumption was significantly associated with an increased long-term risk of MASLD (pooled HR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.11 to 1.58). Moreover, the available evidence suggests no statistically significant association of higher UPF consumption and the long-term risk of developing primary liver cancer (pooled HR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.52 to 2.79), including hepatocellular carcinoma (pooled HR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.66 to 1.45) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR 1.00, 95 % CI 0.50 to 2.03). Sensitivity analyses did not modify these results. When UPF consumption was analyzed as a continuous variable, we found three cohort studies demonstrating its significant association with increased risk of MASLD and three cohort studies reporting conflicting results for primary liver cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that higher consumption of UPFs may contribute to an increased long-term risk of MASLD, highlighting the potential benefits of reducing UPF intake as part of preventive strategies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.