Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Genomic and functional analyses address missing heritability in HDGC-like families lacking CDH1 and CTNNA1 variantsWhy Some Stomach Cancer Families Were Missing a Genetic Answer All Along

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that heterozygous copy number variants and regulatory impairments may explain missing heritability in HDGC-like families lacking CDH1 and CTNNA1 variants.

This cohort study examined 19 HDGC-like probands derived from whole-genome sequencing data, supplemented by data from six additional families. The research focused on HDGC-like families that lacked actionable germline variants in CDH1 and CTNNA1. The primary objective was to solve the issue of missing heritability in these families by identifying novel predisposition mechanisms. Functional analyses were performed using CRISPR-Cas9 editing, RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and microsatellite instability analysis in cell lines and tumours.

The combined analysis of chromatin accessibility, promoter interactions, and whole-genome sequencing identified that 47% of HDGC-like families within the cohort exhibited missing heritability that was subsequently explained. Specific mechanisms included heterozygous CDH3 20kb copy number variants and heterozygous 39bp-intergenic copy number variants, both of which triggered CDH1 mRNA and protein loss via homozygosity by CRISPR-Cas9 editing. Additionally, a heterozygous 2.7Kb germline copy number variant in MLH1 triggered the loss of MLH1 and CDH1/E-cadherin mRNA and protein.

Regulatory elements were found to significantly influence gene expression; each of two hypomorphic tissue-specific regulatory elements contributed 50% to CDH1 expression regulation. Secondary outcomes included CDH1 and E-cadherin protein reduction, MLH1 mRNA and protein reduction, mucin gene impairment, and immune-related pathway impairment. Microsatellite instability was also observed in relevant cases. No adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability issues were reported, as the study involved genomic analysis and functional editing in cell lines rather than clinical intervention.

Key limitations include the small sample size of 19 probands and six families, and the setting was not reported. The study offers no HDGC-targeted life-saving disease prevention measures for HDGC-like families lacking CDH1 and CTNNA1 actionable germline variants. While these findings elucidate molecular mechanisms, clinical application remains uncertain given the observational nature of the cohort and the lack of prospective validation in a broader population.

The negative test that wasn't really an answer

For families with multiple cases of hereditary diffuse stomach cancer, the standard genetic test asks one question: do you carry a damaging change in the CDH1 or CTNNA1 gene?

When the answer is yes, families can take life-saving steps — close monitoring or even preventive removal of the stomach.

When the answer is no, families have historically been told there's nothing more to find. They're left without a clear cause and without access to the same prevention measures.

A new study suggests the answer was there all along — just in places no one was looking.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer is a serious inherited condition. Affected families face a sharply elevated lifetime risk of stomach cancer, often diagnosed at younger ages and with worse outcomes than typical stomach cancers.

The current standard of care for confirmed CDH1 carriers includes intensive screening or, in many cases, prophylactic gastrectomy — preventive removal of the stomach. It's a drastic step, but it can be life-saving.

But more than half of families that meet the clinical criteria for hereditary diffuse stomach cancer test negative on the standard genetic panels. Those families can't access the same prevention pathway, even though their cancer risk may be just as high.

The old way versus the new way

Standard genetic testing focuses on the parts of the genome that code directly for proteins. If the CDH1 protein-coding sequence looks normal, the test is reported as negative.

But that's only part of the genome. Surrounding the protein-coding regions are vast stretches of DNA that don't encode proteins themselves but tell those genes when, where, and how strongly to turn on. Damage to these regulatory regions can silence a gene just as effectively as a mutation in the gene itself.

The new study expanded the search to include those regulatory regions, plus larger structural changes that standard tests can miss.

How regulatory DNA controls gene activity

Imagine a stove. Standard genetic testing checks whether the burners themselves are working. But the stove also has dials that control how high each burner goes. If a dial is broken, the burner doesn't heat properly — even though the burner itself is fine.

CDH1 is the burner. Regulatory regions around it are the dials. The new analysis looked at the dials.

Some of those dials sit close to CDH1. Others sit much farther away in the genome but still control CDH1 through the way DNA folds in three dimensions inside the cell.

The study snapshot

The team analyzed whole-genome sequencing data from 19 families who met clinical criteria for hereditary diffuse stomach cancer but tested negative on standard panels. They also mapped the chromatin landscape and CDH1 promoter interactions in normal stomach tissue. Each candidate change was tested for its functional impact in cell lines using gene-editing tools and confirmed in patient tumor samples.

In nearly half of these previously unexplained families — 47% — the team identified a likely genetic cause.

In one family, a deletion that cut out a regulatory region near CDH1 reduced the gene's protein output significantly. In another family, a small deletion downstream of CDH1 had the same effect through a different regulatory mechanism. A third family carried a deletion in a separate gene called MLH1 that overlapped a stomach-specific control region for CDH1, causing tumor cells to lose both proteins.

Beyond these cases, the team also found multiple smaller deletions in regulatory regions across other genes, particularly affecting mucin proteins and immune-related pathways. These oligogenic patterns — many small contributors instead of one big mutation — appeared most often in families where cancer struck especially young.

This research uncovers causes, not yet a new test that's available everywhere.

Where this fits in the bigger picture

Genetics has been gradually moving beyond protein-coding regions for years. Studies in many cancer syndromes are showing that regulatory mutations and structural changes can cause inherited disease just as powerfully as classic gene mutations.

This work brings that broader strategy to hereditary stomach cancer, where the practical stakes are unusually high. Families currently denied access to prevention pathways could, with the right testing, be reclassified as carriers and offered the same monitoring and surgical options as confirmed CDH1 families.

If you have a strong family history of diffuse stomach cancer and previously tested negative on a standard genetic panel, this study is reason to revisit the question with a specialized hereditary cancer clinic.

Whole-genome sequencing combined with regulatory analysis isn't yet a routine clinical test for most families. But it's available through some research programs and major cancer centers. A genetic counselor familiar with hereditary stomach cancer can help you understand whether reanalysis makes sense for your family.

The study analyzed 19 families — significant for this rare condition but small in absolute terms. The functional confirmations were done in cell lines and animal models, which may not capture all the complexity of how cancer develops in living patients. Whole-genome interpretation also requires specialized expertise that isn't yet widely available in routine clinical settings.

The next steps are larger studies in similar families and the development of clinical tests that can detect these regulatory and structural changes routinely. As that infrastructure builds, more hereditary stomach cancer families should gain access to definitive answers — and to the prevention measures that come with them.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Missing heritability in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) ranges from 60 to 90%. These HDGC-like families, despite complying with HDGC clinical criteria, lack CDH1 and CTNNA1 actionable germline variants, and are not offered HDGC-targeted life-saving disease prevention measures. Herein, we explored novel HDGC predisposition mechanisms affecting the CDH1-regulatory network. We called single-nucleotide (SNV) and copy-number variants (CNV) from 19 HDGC-like probands from whole-genome sequencing data and performed gene-ontology analysis. Chromatin enhancer marks and CDH1 promoter interactions were evaluated in normal stomach by ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq and 4C-seq, variant causality was assessed by RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis in tumours. Functional analysis was performed using CRISPR-Cas9, RT-PCR and flow cytometry in cell lines, and enhancer assays using mouse embryos. Within the CDH1 topologically associating domain (TAD), we found two deletions in Family F4 and F9. F4 carried a heterozygous CDH3 20kb-CNV triggering CDH1 mRNA/protein loss in homozygosity by CRISPR-Cas9 editing, similarly to a CDH1 coding deletion. This 20kb sequence encloses two hypomorphic tissue-specific regulatory elements (REs), each contributing 50% to CDH1 expression regulation. F9 carried a heterozygous 39bp-intergenic CNV downstream of CDH1, triggering CDH1 mRNA/protein loss by CRISPR-Cas9. F15, presenting gastric but not colorectal cancer, carried an MLH1 heterozygous 2.7Kb germline CNV overlapping a stomach-specific RE found by ChIP-seq. The gastric tumour of mixed histology displayed Microsatellite instability (MSI), reduced MLH1 mRNA and protein, and reduced CDH1 and E-cadherin protein. CRISPR-Cas9 clones mimicking the MLH1 heterozygous CNV, triggered loss of MLH1 and CDH1/E-cadherin mRNA and protein, similar to a coding deletion. Beyond the CDH1 TAD and tumour risk syndrome genes, multiple deletions of stomach accessible chromatin sequences were found in particularly young-affected individuals from additional 6 families. This oligogenic pattern impaired specifically mucin genes and multiple immune-related pathways. Herein, we pinpointed novel mechanisms behind HDGC predisposition. One involves deletions of CDH1-REs in the TAD or stomach-specific CDH1-REs in the MLH1 locus. The second involves multiple deletions of stomach REs affecting mucin and immune-related genes, favouring a gastric immune-deficient phenotype. Altogether, by combining stomach-specific chromatin accessibility and promoter interactions with whole genome sequencing, we solved the missing heritability in 47% of HDGC-like families within our cohort.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.