Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Demographic factors influence side preference and completeness in nonsyndromic orofacial clefts across multiethnic cohortsLeft Side Clefts Are Often More Severe

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note demographic associations with cleft completeness in this observational cohort of 3,561 individuals.

This observational cohort study evaluated demographic associations with cleft completeness in 3,561 individuals with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) from multiethnic populations in North and South America, Asia, and Africa. The primary outcome assessed side preference for completeness in nonsyndromic asymmetric bilateral and unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Secondary outcomes examined associations between cleft completeness, sex, ethnicity, and race.

In asymmetric bilateral cases, left-side completeness was significantly more frequent than right-side completeness (73.7% vs. 26.3%, p<0.001). No associations were observed for sex in this specific subgroup. Regarding race and ethnicity, a trend toward significance was observed (50.0% vs 25.5%, p=0.088). When comparing Hispanics versus non-Hispanics in symmetric bilateral and unilateral cases, Hispanics exhibited completeness more frequently (96.4% vs 89.5% for symmetric bilateral; 84.1% vs 79.7% for unilateral, p<0.001 for both). Additionally, Caucasians were less likely to exhibit complete clefts compared to Asians, Blacks, or other racial groups (68.7% vs 84.9% or 81.2% or 81.7%, p<0.001). In unilateral cases, no side preference was observed. Females more frequently presented with completeness than males (81.2% vs 76.6%, p=0.003).

No safety data, adverse events, or discontinuations were reported as the study focused on anatomical characteristics rather than pharmacological interventions. Limitations include the observational nature of the design, which precludes causal inference regarding demographic factors. These findings describe natural variation in cleft presentation across diverse populations but do not inform clinical management of cleft repair or prognosis beyond descriptive epidemiology.

The Hidden Pattern in Clefts

Imagine holding a baby close. You see a gap in the lip. It is a beautiful, loving face that needs help. But the gap is not always the same. Sometimes it goes all the way through. Sometimes it stops halfway.

Doctors have long wondered why. Is it random? Is it about the parents? Or is there a hidden rule?

This new research looks at thousands of children. They found a clear pattern. When the cleft is on both sides but not the same size, the left side is often deeper.

Cleft lip and palate happen in many families. It affects people of all races and backgrounds. For some, the gap goes through the whole lip. For others, it only goes partway.

Current treatments are very good. Surgeons can fix almost any shape. But knowing the starting point helps. If a doctor knows the left side is usually worse, they can prepare better.

It also helps families understand what to expect. It removes the mystery of why one side looks different from the other.

Old Beliefs vs. New Data

For years, doctors thought side preference was random. They believed the left and right sides were equal in risk.

But here is the twist. This study checked 3,561 people. They looked at data from North America, South America, Asia, and Africa.

The numbers told a different story. In cases where the two sides were different, the left side was complete 73.7% of the time. The right side was complete only 26.3% of the time.

That is a big difference. It suggests a biological reason exists.

Think of your body like a blueprint. Most blueprints are symmetrical. But nature sometimes makes mistakes.

Scientists are still studying why the left side is more often affected. It might be how the face forms in the womb. It could be like a traffic jam where cars pile up on one side of the road.

The study also found that Hispanic families had more complete clefts. This was true for both single-sided and double-sided cases.

Researchers looked at four groups of people. They came from different continents. They focused on families without other genetic syndromes.

They checked the type of cleft and how deep it went. They used simple math to find the links. The goal was to find patterns in who gets the deeper cleft.

The most important finding is about the left side. In asymmetric cases, the left side is much more likely to be fully open.

The study also looked at gender. Girls had slightly more complete clefts than boys. But the side difference was much bigger.

Race and ethnicity played a role too. Hispanic participants had higher rates of complete clefts. Caucasian participants had lower rates compared to Asian or Black groups.

But there is a catch.

These numbers describe what happens in nature. They do not tell us how to fix the problem.

Doctors say these patterns are useful for planning. If a surgeon knows the left side is often worse, they can bring the right tools.

This fits into the bigger picture of personalized care. Every child is unique. But groups share common traits.

Understanding these traits helps the whole team. It makes the surgery smoother and the recovery faster.

This information is for doctors and families. It is not a new treatment. It is a map for the journey ahead.

If you are expecting a baby or have a child with a cleft, talk to your doctor. Ask about the specific patterns in your family.

Do not worry about the statistics. They are just tools. Your child will get the best care possible.

This study has limits. It looked at past data. It did not test new drugs or surgeries. The findings are about patterns, not cures.

Also, the study did not find a link to sex or race in every group. Some results were close to the edge of being sure.

Next, doctors will use this map to plan surgeries. They will look for more reasons why the left side is different.

More research will follow. We need to understand the biology fully. This takes time. Science moves step by step.

Soon, we may know even more. Until then, this knowledge helps us care for children better.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Objective: Orofacial clefts may involve the complete vertical thickness of the lip (complete) or partial thickness (incomplete). This study evaluates side preference for completeness in nonsyndromic asymmetric bilateral and unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P). Design: We studied 4 multiethnic cohorts from North and South America, Asia, and Africa, including 3,561 individuals with NSCL/P. Associations between cleft completeness, sex, ethnicity, and race were assessed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test (=0.05). Participants: Patients with NSCL/P with complete information on cleft type and completeness were included. Our main goal was to analyze side preference of complete clefting in different demographic groups, sex and race. Results: Amongst asymmetric bilateral cases, left side completeness was significantly more frequent than the right side (73.7% vs. 26.3%; p<0.001). No associations observed for sex or race with ethnicity showing a trend toward significance (50.0% vs. 25.5%; p=0.088). Amongst symmetric bilateral and unilateral cases, Hispanics exhibited completeness more frequently than non-Hispanics (96.4% vs 89.5%; p<0.001; 84.1% vs. 79.7%; p<0.001). For unilateral cases, completeness showed no side preference. Caucasians were less likely to exhibit complete clefts compared to Asians, Blacks, or other racial groups (68.7% vs 84.9% or 81.2% or 81.7%; p<0.001). Females more frequently presented with completeness than males (81.2% vs 76.6%; p=0.003). Conclusions: In NSCL/P with bilateral asymmetry, the left side is more often complete than the right side. Although unilateral left-sided clefts are more common overall, completeness shows no side preference. Race and ethnicity demonstrate significant associations with cleft severity patterns.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.