Systematic review finds predictive models for dysphagia risk in older adults show variable performance
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the performance of predictive models for dysphagia risk in older adults. The analysis included 17 studies identified from 7,113 records, though specific study settings, interventions, and comparators were not reported. The primary outcome was model performance measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC).
The pooled AUC across studies was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77–0.88), with individual study AUCs ranging from 0.682 to 0.926. Common predictors identified across models included advanced age, smoking history, reduced self-care ability, polypharmacy, frailty, malnutrition, cognitive impairment, and poor oral health. No safety or tolerability data were reported.
Key limitations significantly constrain interpretation. All included studies showed a high overall risk of bias, and the authors noted methodological flaws throughout the evidence base. Only two studies performed external validation, indicating insufficient testing of model generalizability. The review concludes that predictive modeling for dysphagia in older adults remains in an early stage of development.
For clinical practice, this evidence suggests current predictive models show variable discrimination but lack proven reliability. The high risk of bias and limited external validation mean these tools should not yet be relied upon for clinical decision-making. Further rigorous development and validation are needed before considering implementation.