Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Unstable resistance training reduces fear of falling and improves mobility in older adultsUnstable resistance training reduces fear of falling in older adults

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider unstable resistance training to reduce fear of falling and improve long-term mobility in older adults.

This meta-analysis synthesized data from 7 RCTs across 8 articles to compare unstable resistance training (URT) against stable resistance training (SRT) in older adults. The analysis focused on lower limb strength, mobility, and fear of falling over short-term (10 to 12 wk) and long-term (24 wk) periods.

Key findings indicate that URT significantly reduced fear of falling compared to SRT after short-term training. Regarding functional mobility, URT significantly improved Timed Up and Go performance following long-term training compared with SRT. In contrast, no significant improvements in lower limb strength were observed for URT over SRT after short-term training, and SRT showed only a nonsignificant trend toward better performance in the Five-Times Sit-to-Stand test.

Clinical implications suggest that URT may provide specific benefits for psychological barriers like fear of falling and may offer greater functional gains during extended training periods. However, the evidence regarding immediate strength gains from unstable platforms is not clearly superior to stable methods. The results should be interpreted with caution as specific certainty levels were not reported.

A meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials looked at whether unstable resistance training (URT) using tools like balance boards or stability balls offers extra benefits for older adults compared with stable resistance training (SRT) like weight machines or free weights.

The review included older adults and compared short-term (10 to 12 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) training. For lower limb strength and the Five-Times Sit-to-Stand test, URT did not outperform SRT. In fact, SRT showed a nonsignificant trend toward better performance on the sit-to-stand test.

However, URT did show two advantages: it significantly reduced fear of falling after short-term training, and it significantly improved Timed Up and Go performance (a measure of mobility) after long-term training compared with SRT.

The studies did not report any safety issues or side effects. Because the analysis combined small trials, the findings should be considered preliminary. The results suggest that adding unstable elements to resistance training might help older adults feel more confident and move better over time, but more research is needed.

What this means for you:
Unstable resistance training may reduce fear of falling and improve long-term mobility in older adults.

Common questions

What is unstable resistance training?

Unstable resistance training uses equipment like balance boards, stability balls, or other tools that challenge your balance while you do strength exercises. It is different from stable training, which uses weight machines or free weights on a solid surface.

Does unstable training build more strength than stable training?

In this analysis, unstable resistance training did not improve lower limb strength more than stable training after short-term use. Both types appear similar for building strength, but unstable training may offer other benefits like reducing fear of falling.

Who might benefit from unstable resistance training?

The study focused on older adults. Unstable resistance training may help reduce fear of falling and improve mobility over time. If you are an older adult concerned about falls, talk to your doctor or a physical therapist about whether this type of training is right for you.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of unstable resistance training (URT) with stable resistance training (SRT) on lower limb strength, mobility, and fear of falling in older adults. DESIGN: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched through July 9, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing URT with SRT in older adults. Outcomes included lower limb strength (maximal isometric leg extension strength, Five-Times Sit-to-Stand test), mobility (Timed Up and Go test, gait speed), and fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International test). Data were pooled separately for short-term (10 to 12 wk) and long-term (24 wk) interventions. RESULTS: Seven RCTs reported in 8 articles were included; 6 contributed to outcome-specific meta-analyses, and 1 was analyzed descriptively. After short-term training, URT showed no significant improvements over SRT in lower limb strength and mobility outcomes; for the Five-Times Sit-to-Stand test, SRT demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward better performance than URT. URT significantly reduced fear of falling after short-term training and significantly improved Timed Up and Go performance following long-term training compared with SRT. CONCLUSIONS: URT may provide more benefits over SRT in reducing fear of falling in older adults, with greater functional gains after long-term training.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.