Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Exergaming reduces fall rates in older adults with a 0.53 incidence rate ratioExergaming may help reduce the risk of falls in older adults

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider exergaming as an adjunct for fall prevention, but note limited evidence on long-term consistency and safety.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of exergaming interventions for fall prevention in a population of 1385 individuals aged 60 years or older. The study aimed to determine if interactive exercise (exergaming) could serve as an effective method to reduce falls compared to active intervention comparators and usual care. The analysis included various types of exergaming, which combine physical activity with interactive elements like gaming components.

The primary outcomes measured were the fall rate and the number of individuals experiencing one or more falls over a 12-month follow-up period. When comparing exergaming to active intervention comparators, the results indicated that exergaming may reduce fall rates, though specific effect sizes and p-values for this specific comparison were not reported. However, when comparing the number of older adults experiencing one or more falls at a 12-month follow-up against usual care, a significant reduction was observed with a risk ratio of 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.92).

Furthermore, when exergaming was compared to all control groups combined, the analysis reported a lower overall fall rate. This finding was quantified by an incidence rate ratio of 0.53 (95% CI 0.41-0.68) with an I-squared value of 76%. These results suggest that exergaming may be more effective than standard care or certain other interventions in reducing the frequency and occurrence of falls among older adults.

Secondary outcomes included the number of fallers, injurious falls, quality of life, concerns about falling, adherence, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. While these factors are clinically relevant for geriatric care, specific data points for these secondary outcomes were not provided in the primary analysis results. Safety and tolerability data were also limited; evidence regarding adverse events was described as limited or inconsistent, and no data on serious adverse events or discontinuation rates were reported.

These findings contribute to a landscape where various interventions are tested for fall prevention. While some digital programs have shown improvements in balance scores and others have demonstrated feasibility in nursing home settings, the specific impact of exergaming provides a distinct look at interactive exercise. However, the evidence for reduced fall rates is characterized as low- to moderate-certainty, while the evidence for a reduced number of fallers is of moderate-certainty.

Several methodological limitations must be considered when interpreting these results. The analysis noted substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, modest sample sizes, and limited long-term follow-up data. These factors contribute to the uncertainty regarding the consistency of the effect across different populations or settings. Consequently, while exergaming shows promise as an adjunct to established fall prevention strategies, it cannot be recommended for routine implementation based on this evidence alone.

Clinically, exergaming may offer a useful tool for patients who find it difficult to engage with conventional exercise programs due to lack of motivation or engagement. It provides a potential alternative for maintaining physical activity in older adults. However, clinicians should remain aware of the limitations regarding the consistency of these results across different populations. Future research is needed to address the heterogeneity and provide longer-term follow-up data to confirm the sustainability of these outcomes.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding how interactive exercise impacts fall rates compared to standard care. It complements findings on digital programs that improve balance scores, though it provides more specific evidence regarding the reduction of falls rather than just balance metrics. Unlike some telemedicine interventions that showed no difference in self-reported falls, this analysis found a risk ratio of 0.75 for reduced fallers at 12 months compared to usual care.

Falling is a major concern for many people as they get older. It can lead to painful injuries and may cause some individuals to become less active out of fear. For these reasons, finding effective ways to improve balance and stability is very important for maintaining independence and safety in daily life.

To explore new options, researchers conducted a meta-analysis, which is a study that combines the results of several other trials. They looked at data from 1,385 people aged 60 and older who participated in exergaming. Exergaming refers to video games that require physical movement, such as dancing or using motion sensors, rather than just sitting on a couch with a controller.

The results showed that exergaming may help reduce the overall rate of falls compared to other active exercises. Specifically, when comparing exergaming to standard care, the study found a significant reduction in the number of people who experienced at least one fall over a 12-month period. The data suggested that those using these interactive games were less likely to fall than those receiving standard care. However, the evidence for whether it lowers the overall rate compared to other types of active exercise is currently considered only low to moderate in certainty.

Safety data regarding these programs was limited or inconsistent across the studies reviewed. There were no specific reports of serious injuries caused by the games themselves. Because the study combined many different types of programs, it is hard to say exactly how safe one specific game might be for every individual.

It is important to keep some perspective on these findings. This meta-analysis showed significant differences in how various studies were conducted and how large their groups were. Because the data was varied and some study sizes were small, we cannot yet say that exergaming is a perfect replacement for traditional exercise. The long-term effects of these programs are also not fully known.

For patients right now, this means that exergaming could be a helpful addition to existing fall prevention plans. It might be especially useful for older adults who find it difficult to stay motivated with traditional gym routines but enjoy interactive technology. While it is not a guaranteed fix, it offers a promising way to keep people moving and active.

What this means for you:
Exergaming may reduce the number of falls in older adults, potentially serving as a helpful addition to exercise plans.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,385
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up720.0 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Exergames, which combine physical exercise with interactive gameplay, are increasingly being incorporated into fall prevention programs for older adults. Gamified elements, such as real-time feedback and progress tracking, may enhance motivation, engagement, and adherence. Although several systematic reviews have examined the effects of exergaming on balance and physical function, fewer have focused specifically on clinically meaningful outcomes, such as falls and injurious falls, or on indicators that may influence real-world adoption of exergames. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of exergaming interventions for preventing falls and injurious falls in people aged ≥60 years and to synthesize evidence on implementation-related outcomes, including adherence, acceptability, concerns about falling, quality of life, adverse events, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating exergaming interventions in older adult populations across all settings. Outcomes included fall rate, number of fallers and injurious falls, and implementation-related secondary outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0, and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Data were synthesized narratively and, where appropriate, pooled using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine studies (N=1385) met the inclusion criteria. Comparator-specific analyses suggested that exergaming may reduce fall rates compared with active intervention comparators, although the magnitude and certainty of effect varied, and substantial heterogeneity was present across analyses. Moderate-certainty evidence also suggested that exergames reduced the number of older adults experiencing one or more falls at 12-month follow-up compared with usual care (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92). Evidence for injurious falls, quality of life, concerns about falling, adherence, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness was limited or inconsistent. When pooled across all control groups, exergaming interventions were associated with a lower overall fall rate than comparator interventions (incidence rate ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68), although substantial heterogeneity was present (I²=76%). CONCLUSIONS: Low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests that exergames may reduce fall rates, particularly in comparisons with active intervention control groups, and may reduce the number of fallers compared with usual care. These findings indicate that exergaming may offer a useful adjunct to established fall prevention strategies for older adults, particularly where sustained engagement with conventional exercise is challenging. However, substantial heterogeneity, modest sample sizes, and limited long-term follow-up reduce confidence in these estimates, and more rigorous, large-scale trials are needed before routine implementation can be recommended. This review extends previous exergaming syntheses by focusing on clinically meaningful outcomes, including falls and injurious falls, while also considering implementation-related factors relevant to real-world uptake.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.