Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Home-based cardiac rehabilitation improved physical function in frail older patients with cardiovascular disease.

Home-based cardiac rehabilitation improved physical function in frail older patients with cardiovasc…
Photo by Hoi An and Da Nang Photographer / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider home-based cardiac rehabilitation for frail older patients with CVD, noting secondary analysis limitations.

This study was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial conducted in a multicenter, home-based setting. The population consisted of 153 participants in the intervention group and 153 in the control group, though only 85 participants per group had complete follow-up data. The intervention involved transitional care followed by physical therapist-led home-based cardiac rehabilitation and community nurse visits. The comparator details were not reported in the available data.

The primary outcome assessed the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). At six months, more participants in the intervention group demonstrated SPPB improvement (61% vs 51%) or maintenance (29% vs 12%), and fewer deteriorated (11% vs 37%). The mean SPPB value was 6.3 (SD=0.3) in the intervention group versus 5.5 (SD=0.2) in the control group, yielding a mean difference of 0.8 with a 95% CI of 0.0 to 1.6.

Secondary outcomes included the 2-min step test, grip strength, and the Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale. No between-group differences were observed for these measures. Safety data, including adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported. The study authors performed sensitivity analyses, though limitations regarding generalizability and the secondary nature of the analysis remain.

The findings suggest that home-based cardiac rehabilitation may be effective for physical functioning in frail older adults with cardiovascular disease. However, the lack of differences in secondary outcomes and the inclusion of zero in the confidence interval for the primary outcome warrant caution. These results substantiate the potential effectiveness of such interventions but require confirmation in primary analyses with complete data.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 153
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IMPORTANCE: Older patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at risk of physical function decline and adverse health outcomes. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves physical functioning but is underutilized by older patients. Home-based CR potentially improves utilization, yet its effectiveness in older patients who are frail remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of a transitional-care integrated home-based CR program on physical functioning in older patients who are frail after CVD hospitalization. DESIGN: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of physical functioning at the 6-month follow-up in the cardiac care bridge multicenter randomized trial. SETTING: A home-based setting was used. PARTICIPANTS: The study participants were patients who were frail and ≥70 years old after CVD hospitalization. INTERVENTION: The intervention was transitional care followed by physical therapist led home-based CR and community nurse visits. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary physical function outcome was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in cases with complete follow-up data. Secondary outcomes included the 2-min step test, grip strength, and Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale. Sensitivity analyses included an intention-to-treat analysis by multiple imputation of the full cohort. RESULTS: In total, 85 of 153 participants in the intervention group and 85 of 153 participants in the control group were analyzed (mean age = 82.6 [SD = 6.3] years; 46% men; median of 2 [interquartile range = 1-4] comorbidities). At the 6-month follow-up, more participants in the intervention group than in the control group demonstrated SPPB improvement (61% vs 51%) or maintenance (29% vs 12%), and fewer deteriorated (11% vs 37%). The mean SPPB values at 6 months were 6.3 (SD = 0.3) and 5.5 (SD = 0.2), respectively, with a mean difference of 0.8 (95% CI = 0.0-1.6), favoring the intervention group. No between-group differences were observed in the 2-min step test, grip strength, or Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients who were frail and had CVD, a comprehensive transitional-care program with integrated home-based CR resulted in clinically relevant improvements in physical functioning. RELEVANCE: The results substantiate the effectiveness of home-based CR in older patients who are frail and have CVD.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.