Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Telemedicine-based STEADI implementation showed no difference in self-reported falls among older adults compared to standard careTelemedicine visits now screen seniors for hidden fall risk

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note no significant difference in self-reported falls between telemedicine STEADI and standard care in older adults.

This randomized controlled quality improvement trial enrolled 660 older adults aged 65 years and above in primary care settings. Participants were assigned to receive either telemedicine-based STEADI implementation or standard-of-care. The intervention involved fall risk assessment by a research nurse, STEADI-based recommendations shared with primary care physicians, and recommended interventions administered at the discretion of the physicians.

The primary outcome was self-reported falls. Overall, 5.5% of participants reported a fall in the past 12 months. No significant differences were observed between the intervention and comparator groups for this primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included medically treated falls, fall-related service utilization, and medication changes. No significant differences were observed between groups for medically treated falls, with an odds ratio of 0.741 and a 95% CI of 0.411-1.336.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in this trial. Key limitations included limited recruitment, low baseline fall rates, and unmeasured adherence. The study did not report adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or specific tolerability metrics. These factors may influence the interpretation of the results regarding the intervention's real-world impact.

Practice relevance is tempered by the need for further research to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine-based STEADI interventions in primary care. The findings do not establish causation, and the results should be interpreted with caution given the study design and limitations.

Falls are one of the biggest health threats for older adults. They can lead to broken bones, hospital stays, and a loss of independence. Many seniors worry about falling at home, and family members worry too. A new study tested a way to catch fall risk early using telemedicine visits with a primary care doctor.

The study looked at a program called STEADI, which stands for Stopping Elderly Accident, Deaths, and Injuries. The goal is simple. Screen for risk, evaluate the causes, and address the things that can be changed. Researchers wanted to see if this could work through telemedicine, which is care by phone or video. This matters now because more people use telemedicine than ever before.

In the past, fall prevention often happened only after a fall. Doctors might ask about falls during a yearly checkup, but not every visit. The new approach tries to catch risk before a fall happens. It uses a short screening tool and then shares clear steps with the doctor. But here is the twist. The study tested whether this telemedicine approach actually reduces falls over one year.

Think of fall risk like a traffic jam. Many small things slow you down. Weak legs, poor vision, certain medicines, and balance problems can stack up. The STEADI program tries to clear the road. It looks for the biggest blockers and helps the doctor and patient fix them. It is like a switch that helps keep you steady on your feet.

The study was a randomized controlled trial during the COVID-19 pandemic. It ran from July 2020 to December 2021. Primary care doctors were split into two groups. One group used standard care. The other group used the STEADI telemedicine program. A research nurse screened patients by phone or video and shared recommendations with the doctor. The doctor then decided which steps to take. The study followed 660 older adults for one year.

Most participants were women, between 65 and 79 years old, and non-Hispanic White. About 5.5 percent reported a fall in the past 12 months. The group in the STEADI program had higher risk scores at baseline, which means they were more likely to be at risk for a fall. Researchers tracked self-reported falls, medically treated falls, use of services like physical therapy, and changes in medications.

The main result was clear. The program did not lead to fewer falls compared with standard care. Medically treated falls were similar between the two groups. The odds were a bit lower in the STEADI group, but the difference was not statistically significant. In plain English, the change could be due to chance. The study also found no clear difference in fall-related services or medication changes.

But there is a catch. The study had some limits that may have affected the results. Recruitment was limited during the pandemic, and the overall rate of falls at baseline was low. Not every patient followed every recommendation, and the study could not measure that fully. These factors can make it harder to see a real effect.

Experts in the field say this is an important step. Telemedicine can reach people who might not come into the clinic. It can help doctors screen more often and catch risk earlier. Even without a drop in falls in this study, the program may still help doctors and patients talk about fall risk more often. That conversation alone can be valuable.

For patients and caregivers, this means you can ask about fall risk during a telemedicine visit. You can request a screening and discuss simple steps like vision checks, medication reviews, and balance exercises. If you have had a fall or feel unsteady, tell your doctor. You do not need to wait for your next in-person visit to start the conversation.

This does not mean the program is not useful.

The study also shows how hard it is to change health outcomes in a short time. Fall prevention often needs a mix of steps over many months. It takes time for exercise to build strength, for vision to be corrected, and for medication changes to take effect. The study followed people for one year, which may not be long enough to see a clear difference.

What happens next. Researchers need larger studies with more diverse participants. They also need better ways to track whether patients follow the recommended steps. Future trials can test how to make telemedicine screening easier and more engaging. They can also look at which parts of the program work best for which patients. Until then, the best advice is simple. Talk to your doctor about fall risk, whether in person or by phone, and take small steps to stay steady and independent.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 660
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up780.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Falls are a leading cause of injury and death among older adults (65 years and above). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accident, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative aims to reduce falls by screening to find at-risk individuals, evaluation, and then addressing modifiable risk factors. This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a STEADI-based multi-component fall prevention approach via telemedicine in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized controlled quality improvement trial (STEADI Options) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2020-December 2021). Primary care professionals (PCPs) were randomized to either standard-of-care (SOC) or intervention. The intervention included a fall risk assessment by a research nurse, who shared STEADI-based recommendations with PCPs. Recommended interventions were administered at the discretion of PCPs. Outcomes included self-reported falls (primary), medically treated falls, fall-related service utilization (physical therapy, occupational therapy, eye care, podiatry), and medication changes, assessed over one year. Analyses followed an intent-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Among 660 participants (353 SOC; 307 intervention), the cohort was predominantly female (67.7%), aged 65-79 years (73.6%), and non-Hispanic White (56.1%). Intervention participants had higher average Stay Independent Screener (SIS) scores (6.3 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Overall, 5.5% reported a fall in the past 12 months. No significant differences were observed between groups in fall-related outcomes (e.g., medically treated falls odds ratio [adjusted for SIS]: 0.741; 95% CI: 0.411-1.336). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Although no significant differences were found, limited recruitment, low baseline fall rates, and unmeasured adherence may have impacted results. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine-based STEADI interventions in primary care.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.