When leukemia returns or resists treatment, options are limited and the stakes are high. This review combined data from many studies on adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. It looked at using two drugs together: hypomethylating agents and venetoclax. The main finding was that about half of patients saw their cancer respond. Specifically, the overall response rate was 50%, and 43% achieved a complete remission or a similar deep response. About 42% had no measurable residual disease left. The median overall survival was 8 months, and 40% were alive after one year. The analysis included 2,289 patients. Safety signals included serious infections, febrile neutropenia, and low blood cell counts. A key caveat is the high statistical heterogeneity, meaning the studies varied a lot, so the results should be interpreted with some caution. This combination may be a potential re-induction regimen for these patients, but it was not compared to more intensive salvage regimens.
HMA-venetoclax yields 50% overall response rate in relapsed/refractory AML meta-analysisCombination therapy shows response in relapsed leukemia
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from 2289 adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with a combination of hypomethylating agents (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN). The analysis aimed to characterize treatment response and survival outcomes in this difficult-to-treat population.
Key findings include a complete remission rate of 26% (95% CI: 24-48%), a composite CR/CRi rate of 43% (95% CI: 41-46%), and an overall response rate of 50% (95% CI: 48-53%). Measurable residual disease negativity was achieved in 42% of patients (95% CI: 38-46%). Median overall survival was 8 months (IQR: 3-25), with a one-year overall survival rate of 40% (IQR: 23-55).
Safety data indicate that grade ≥3 toxicities included febrile neutropenia, infection, and cytopenia. The authors note high statistical heterogeneity as a key limitation, which tempers the certainty of pooled estimates. The comparator was not reported, and the analysis does not directly compare HMA-VEN to more intensive salvage regimens.
Despite these limitations, the findings suggest HMA-VEN may serve as a potential re-induction regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory AML, though clinicians should interpret the results cautiously given the heterogeneity and lack of direct comparator data.