Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Educational interventions modestly reduce average drugs per prescription in MENA region hospitalsEducational programs show modest improvement in drug prescribing across MENA region

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Context-specific stewardship programs may modestly reduce drug counts in MENA hospitals.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of multifaceted and educational interventions on prescribing quality within the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The analysis included sixteen studies and assessed WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators such as the average number of drugs per prescription, antibiotic use, injection use, generic prescribing, and essential medicines list adherence.

The primary finding was a modest reduction in the average number of drugs per prescription. The weighted mean difference was -0.10 with a 95% CI ranging from -0.18 to -0.02. Trends toward fewer antibiotic and injection prescriptions were observed but were not statistically significant, with odds ratios of 0.65 and 0.93 respectively.

The authors noted extreme statistical heterogeneity with an I-squared up to 99.8%. GRADE certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes. Non-significant pooled effects were found for antibiotics and injections. Safety data and discontinuations were not reported.

Practice relevance suggests that context-specific stewardship and prescribing quality programs can achieve targeted improvements despite the low certainty of evidence.

This systematic review and meta-analysis looked at how educational and multifaceted interventions affect prescribing habits in the Middle East and North Africa region. The analysis combined data from sixteen different studies in this area to see if these programs could improve how medicines are prescribed. The researchers focused on specific indicators like the number of drugs given per prescription and the use of antibiotics or injections.

The results showed a modest reduction in the average number of drugs per prescription. However, the data did not show a statistically significant change in the odds of prescriptions containing antibiotics or injections. The overall certainty of the evidence was rated as low to very low for all outcomes due to extreme statistical differences between the studies.

Readers should note that these findings suggest context-specific stewardship and prescribing quality programs can achieve targeted improvements. Because the evidence is limited and the results for antibiotics and injections were not statistically significant, these programs should be viewed as promising but not yet proven to work reliably in every setting.

What this means for you:
Educational interventions showed modest improvement in prescribing but evidence certainty was low.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Rational prescribing is challenging due to global antibiotic resistance and widespread polypharmacy. Evidence on effective interventions to improve prescribing practices in MENA is limited. AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of multifaceted and educational interventions in improving WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). METHOD: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and CINHAL up to June 10, 2025, for experimental studies evaluating the effectiveness of multifaceted interventions on WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators. Searches were supplemented by screening reference lists of relevant reviews, first 20 pages of Google Scholar results, and ResearchRabbit.ai for citation-chaining to identify additional records. Primary outcomes included WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators: average number of drugs per prescription, percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed, percentage of encounters with an injection prescribed, percentage of drugs prescribed by generics, and percentage of drugs prescribed from the essential medicines list. Methodological quality was assessed with the MASTER scale. Meta-analysis used a bias-adjusted inverse-variance heterogeneity model adjusted with quality score. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using I, the Doi plot, and LFK index. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (seven RCTs, six pre-post, three quasi-experimental) from Iran, UAE, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Palestine were included. Multifaceted interventions modestly reduced the average number of drugs per prescription (weighted mean difference WMD - 0.10, (95% CI - 0.18 to -0.02; I = 99.8%). There was a downward trend in the odds of prescriptions with antibiotics (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.03, I = 93.5%) and injections (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.04, I = 25.3%), though these did not reach statistical significance and confidence intervals included the possibility of no effect. Meta-analysis revealed extreme statistical heterogeneity (I up to 99.8%), and the GRADE certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Multifaceted interventions in the MENA region demonstrate potential for modest improvements in prescribing indicators, though evidence certainty remains low to very low. With non-significant pooled effects for antibiotics and injections, these exploratory findings suggest that context-specific stewardship and prescribing quality programs can achieve targeted improvements, but also highlight the need for more locally led, rigorous research with longer follow-up to inform policy decisions.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.