Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Local antibiotic delivery systems increase healing rates in diabetic foot osteomyelitis compared with control groups in this meta-analysisLocal Antibiotics May Boost Healing in Diabetic Foot Infections

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider local antibiotic delivery systems for diabetic foot osteomyelitis to potentially improve healing rates.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the use of local antibiotic delivery systems for patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The analysis pooled data from studies involving 491 patients to compare outcomes against a control group. The primary outcome assessed was the healing rate. Results indicated a significantly higher healing rate in the antibiotic group with a relative risk of 1.18 and a 95% CI of 1.01 to 1.38. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rates, amputation rates, healing time, and hospital stays. No significant differences were found for these secondary outcomes, with relative risks or mean differences showing wide confidence intervals that crossed the null value. For example, recurrence rates showed a relative risk of 0.30 with a 95% CI of 0.04 to 2.12. Amputation rates had a relative risk of 0.22 with a 95% CI of 0.03 to 1.91. Healing time and hospital stays also showed no significant difference. Safety data, including adverse events and tolerability, were not reported in the source. The authors explicitly state that larger randomized controlled trials are necessary in the future to further clarify these findings.

A recent analysis of 491 patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, a serious bone infection, found that using local antibiotic delivery systems may help improve healing rates compared to standard care. The study, a systematic review and meta-analysis, showed that patients who received local antibiotics were about 18% more likely to heal, though the results were borderline significant.

However, the analysis found no significant differences in other important outcomes, such as recurrence of infection, amputation rates, healing time, or length of hospital stays. This means that while local antibiotics might help with initial healing, they may not prevent the infection from coming back or reduce the need for amputation.

The researchers note that the evidence is limited and that larger, more rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. The study did not report on any safety concerns, such as side effects or complications from the local antibiotic treatment.

For now, this analysis provides a hint that local antibiotic delivery could be a useful addition to treatment for diabetic foot infections, but it is not yet practice-changing. Patients should discuss all treatment options with their healthcare provider.

What this means for you:
Local antibiotics may improve healing in diabetic foot infections, but more research is needed.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 491
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PurposeWe aim to evaluate the efficacy of local antibiotic delivery systems in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).MethodsThe Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for relevant publications until March 2024. All studies evaluating the efficacy of local antibiotic delivery systems in patients with DFO were included. We calculated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs for binary outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. The Cochrane's risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) assessment were used to evaluate the quality of studies.ResultsA total of 9 studies with 491 patients were included in this analysis. The overall healing rate in antibiotic group was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.97). Healing rates were significantly higher in the antibiotic group compared to the control group (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.38). Furthermore, recurrence rates and amputation rates have no significantly difference between the antibiotic group and the control group (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.04, 2.12 and RR: 0.22, 95% CI:0.03, 1.91), along with no significantly difference in healing time and hospital stays(MD: -7.87, 95% CI: -20.81, 5.07 and MD:-2.33, 95% CI:-5.17, 0.50). No obvious publication bias was observed in the funnel plot (Egger's test, = .99).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis found that diabetic foot osteomyelitis patients treated with local antibiotic delivery systems had better healing rates than the control group. However, no significant differences were found in healing time, recurrence, hospital stays, or amputation rates. Larger randomized controlled trials are necessary in the future.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.