Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Health communication strategies for Nigerian parents' vaccine hesitancy identified in systematic reviewStrategies to ease parents' vaccine doubts in Nigeria

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider using multi-channeled, culturally attuned communication strategies to address parental vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria, but recognize evidence of effectiveness is lacking.

This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 12 studies conducted in Nigeria, focusing on health communication strategies to address parental hesitancy to childhood vaccination among parents, carers, or primary caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years. The review identifies four categories of strategies: media campaign strategies, state-sponsored communication strategies, community-centered strategies, and phone-based strategies. These strategies are described as culturally attuned and multi-channeled, responsive to structural constraints and community information needs.

The review does not report pooled effect sizes or comparative effectiveness data. Instead, it provides a qualitative synthesis of the types of communication approaches that have been used or proposed in the Nigerian context. The authors emphasize the importance of community-centered approaches, media platforms, and mobile phone text messaging as key channels for reaching caregivers.

Limitations are not explicitly reported in the source, but the review's scope is descriptive rather than evaluative. The authors do not measure the efficacy of specific interventions, and no data on outcomes such as vaccination uptake or hesitancy reduction are provided. The absence of comparator groups and effect sizes limits the ability to draw conclusions about which strategies are most effective.

For clinicians and public health practitioners, the review offers a framework for designing communication interventions in Nigeria, but it should not be interpreted as evidence of effectiveness. Future research would be needed to compare these strategies and quantify their impact on vaccination outcomes.

How this fits prior evidence

This systematic review extends prior coverage by focusing specifically on health communication strategies in Nigeria, whereas earlier coverage examined educational or psychological interventions across 11 studies with mixed effectiveness. The current review identifies concrete strategy categories (media, state-sponsored, community-centered, phone-based) but does not measure efficacy, consistent with the earlier finding of considerable variability. It addresses a gap by detailing culturally attuned, multi-channeled approaches for a specific population, though it does not resolve the question of which strategies work best.

When parents hesitate to vaccinate their children, the reasons are often complex: worries about safety, mistrust of authorities, or simply not having clear information. In Nigeria, where many children miss out on routine vaccines, a new review looked at what actually helps. The findings point to four broad strategies: media campaigns, state-sponsored communication, community-centered efforts, and phone-based messages. These approaches meet parents where they are, using trusted voices and convenient channels like text messages.

The review included 12 studies from Nigeria, all focused on parents, carers, or primary caregivers of children up to 3 years old. It did not measure which strategy worked best, but rather mapped the landscape of communication efforts. That means we can't say one approach is better than another, only that these are the types being used.

What stands out is the emphasis on cultural fit. Strategies that involve community leaders or local influencers may carry more weight than generic messages. Similarly, using mobile phones to send reminders or information can reach parents who might not have access to clinics or the internet.

It's important to note that this review is a starting point, not a final answer. It identifies strategies, but it doesn't tell us how effective each one is. More research is needed to compare these approaches and see which ones truly increase vaccination rates. For now, the takeaway is that a one-size-fits-all approach won't work. Tailoring communication to the community's needs and constraints is key.

What this means for you:
Four communication strategies may help address vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria, but more research is needed to know which work best.

Common questions

What are the four strategies to address vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria?

The review identified four types of health communication strategies: media campaigns, state-sponsored communication, community-centered strategies, and phone-based strategies. These approaches aim to reach parents and caregivers in different ways, such as through mass media, government messages, community leaders, or text messages.

Who was included in the studies?

The studies involved parents, carers, or primary caregivers of children between the ages of 0 and 3 years in Nigeria. The review included 12 studies in total, all focused on this group.

Does this review prove which strategy is most effective?

No. The review identifies strategies that have been used, but it does not measure how effective each one is. It's a synthesis of what's out there, not a comparison of outcomes. More research is needed to know which approaches actually increase vaccination rates.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Childhood vaccine hesitancy is a significant public health concern. In Nigeria, it remains a major barrier to achieving optimal immunization uptake, contributing to preventable morbidity and mortality. Yet there remains a significant research gap on the synthesis of health communication strategies to address parental hesitancy to childhood vaccination. The primary aim and original contribution of the present review is to synthesize health communication strategies to address parental hesitancy to childhood vaccination in Nigeria. The review strategy was underpinned by the Population, phenomenon of interest and context (PICo) model. Hence, the population (parents, carers, or primary caregivers of children between the ages of 0 and 3 years), the phenomenon of interest (health communication strategies to address parental hesitancy to childhood vaccination), and the context (vaccine hesitancy). For qualitative studies, the PICo strategy, which is a modified version of PICO, was used. Boolean operators (AND/OR/NOT) were used to ensure rigor in adopting informed search terms. Six databases were searched for published articles between 2017 and March 2026. N = 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, and the relevant data were synthesized and analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. The review protocol was pre-registered on the PROSPERO Registry (no. CRD420261303323). The synthesized studies and analyses yielded the following main findings: (i) Media campaign strategies, (ii) State-sponsored communication strategies, (iii) Community-centered strategies, and (iv) Phone-based strategies. Childhood vaccine hesitancy remains a major challenge in Nigeria. The review recommends that vaccine communication be culturally attuned and multi-channeled (e.g., embedding community-centered mechanisms—particularly those involving trusted religious and traditional leaders, media platforms, and mobile phone text messaging). It also recommends that vaccine communication be responsive to both structural constraints and community information need to address parental hesitancy to childhood vaccine uptake.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.