DOACs reduce thromboembolic events in pediatric patients compared to standard anticoagulation
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus standard of care (primarily heparin) for thromboembolic event treatment and prophylaxis in pediatric patients. The analysis included data from 2,002 children, though specific study settings and follow-up duration were not reported.
For treatment studies, DOACs significantly reduced thromboembolic event recurrence with a relative risk of 0.50 (95% CI 0.25–0.99). In prophylaxis studies, DOACs significantly reduced thromboembolic event occurrence with a relative risk of 0.63 (95% CI 0.42–0.95). Absolute event numbers were not reported for these outcomes.
Regarding safety, major bleeding showed a favorable trend for DOACs (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.26–1.55) but did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were found for all-cause mortality or serious adverse events, though specific effect sizes and absolute numbers were not reported for these outcomes. The analysis noted that comprehensive evidence regarding DOAC use for both treatment and prophylaxis remains limited in pediatric populations.
While these findings suggest DOACs represent an effective alternative to standard anticoagulation for thromboembolism management in children, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously given the observational nature of the included studies and limited evidence base. The favorable bleeding trend requires confirmation in larger, prospective trials.