Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

DOACs reduce thromboembolic events in pediatric patients compared to standard anticoagulation

DOACs reduce thromboembolic events in pediatric patients compared to standard anticoagulation
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider DOACs as an alternative for pediatric thromboembolism, but evidence remains limited.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus standard of care (primarily heparin) for thromboembolic event treatment and prophylaxis in pediatric patients. The analysis included data from 2,002 children, though specific study settings and follow-up duration were not reported.

For treatment studies, DOACs significantly reduced thromboembolic event recurrence with a relative risk of 0.50 (95% CI 0.25–0.99). In prophylaxis studies, DOACs significantly reduced thromboembolic event occurrence with a relative risk of 0.63 (95% CI 0.42–0.95). Absolute event numbers were not reported for these outcomes.

Regarding safety, major bleeding showed a favorable trend for DOACs (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.26–1.55) but did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were found for all-cause mortality or serious adverse events, though specific effect sizes and absolute numbers were not reported for these outcomes. The analysis noted that comprehensive evidence regarding DOAC use for both treatment and prophylaxis remains limited in pediatric populations.

While these findings suggest DOACs represent an effective alternative to standard anticoagulation for thromboembolism management in children, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously given the observational nature of the included studies and limited evidence base. The favorable bleeding trend requires confirmation in larger, prospective trials.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Thromboembolic events (TE) are increasingly recognized in pediatric patients, necessitating optimal antithrombotic therapy. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer potential advantages over standard of care (SOC) such as heparin, comprehensive evidence regarding their use for treatment and prophylaxis remains limited. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of these two classes of anticoagulants. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to November 27, 2025, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with SOC in pediatric patients. Data were synthesized using fixed- or random-effects models to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eight RCTs involving 2,002 pediatric patients were included. In terms of efficacy, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction in TE recurrence in treatment studies (RR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.25–0.99) and TE occurrence in prophylaxis studies (RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.95). Regarding safety, major bleeding was comparable to SOC with a favorable trend observed for DOACs (RR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.26–1.55). No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. DOACs represent an effective alternative to SOC for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism in children, demonstrating superior efficacy without increasing the risk of bleeding events. PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024506541, CRD42024506541.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.