Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis of NHPI populations shows low pooled Pap testing and HPV vaccine initiation rates with high treatment disparities.

Meta-analysis of NHPI populations shows low pooled Pap testing and HPV vaccine initiation rates with…
Photo by Haberdoedas / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note substantial heterogeneity in NHPI cervical cancer screening and vaccination rates; disparities in treatment and outcomes warrant culturally tailored interventions.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined cervical cancer prevention metrics, treatment disparities, and effective interventions specifically within Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) populations. The analysis synthesized data from 27 studies, though the specific setting and follow-up duration were not reported. The primary focus was on screening uptake, vaccination rates, and access to timely treatment.

The pooled rate for Pap testing was 62% (95% CI: 46%-75%), while the pooled rate for HPV vaccine initiation was 26% (95% CI: 16%-37%). Substantial heterogeneity was noted for both metrics, with I² values of 98.7% for Pap testing and 84.3% for HPV vaccine initiation, indicating considerable variability between the included studies. Regarding treatment, NHPI patients were less likely to receive timely and guideline-concordant cervical cancer treatment compared to other groups.

NHPI patients also exhibited higher rates of late-stage diagnoses and increased mortality. No specific adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability data were reported for the interventions, as the review focused on disparities rather than drug safety. The study authors noted that findings on treatment and outcomes were based on narrative synthesis from studies unsuitable for quantitative meta-analysis, meaning specific effect sizes for these outcomes were not provided.

Key limitations include the substantial heterogeneity in pooled estimates and the reliance on observational data, which precludes causal conclusions. The practice relevance highlights that culturally tailored interventions and policies addressing systemic barriers are critical to reducing these inequities. Clinicians should interpret these pooled rates as estimates subject to significant variability across different healthcare contexts.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) populations face significant disparities in cervical cancer prevention and treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines cervical cancer prevention metrics, treatment disparities, and effective interventions among NHPI populations. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Embase for studies published between 2000 and 2024 that reported cervical cancer prevention metrics in NHPI populations. Eligible studies included quantitative and qualitative designs with NHPI-specific or disaggregated data. Pap testing and HPV vaccination rates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Narrative synthesis summarized findings from studies unsuitable for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included. The pooled Pap testing rate was 62% (95% CI: 46%-75%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 98.7%). The pooled HPV vaccine initiation rate was 25% (95% CI: 16%-37%; I² = 84.3%). Barriers included limited healthcare access, lack of physician recommendations, cultural stigma, and geographic isolation. Effective interventions, such as culturally tailored educational materials and community-based participatory approaches, demonstrated improved screening and vaccination rates. NHPI patients were less likely to receive timely and guideline-concordant cervical cancer treatment and had higher rates of late-stage diagnoses and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: NHPI populations face persistent cervical cancer prevention and treatment disparities. Culturally tailored interventions and policies addressing systemic barriers are critical to reducing these inequities. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies and scalable interventions to improve outcomes in NHPI communities.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.