A retrospective cohort study at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University evaluated 69 patients with clinically diagnosed complex skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Researchers compared metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) testing against conventional bacterial culture and pathological examination, primarily assessing pathogen detection rates.
mNGS demonstrated significantly higher pathogen detection rates than conventional culture (P < 0.001). In culture-negative patients, mNGS identified pathogens in 20 of 24 cases (83.3% detection rate). Concordance between the two methods was 37.5%. While conventional culture detected pathogens in only 2 of 20 cases with polymicrobial infections, mNGS identified multiple pathogens in the majority of such cases.
Antibiotic therapy was adjusted based on mNGS results in 8 of 69 patients (11.9%). Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study had several limitations: it was retrospective, single-center, and lacked reported funding or conflict disclosures. The sample size was modest at 69 patients.
For clinical practice, these findings suggest mNGS may provide additional diagnostic information in complex SSTIs, particularly in culture-negative cases or suspected polymicrobial infections. The observed antibiotic adjustments (11.9%) indicate potential utility in guiding therapy. However, as an observational study, these results require prospective validation before determining mNGS's precise role in routine SSTI management.
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundSkin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), often caused by polymicrobial pathogens, pose diagnostic challenges due to the limitations of conventional methods, including low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround time. This diagnostic gap has perpetuated empirical antibiotic use in clinical practice. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), with its unbiased pathogen detection capability, offers a transformative approach for rapid and precise microbial identification in SSTIs.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical utility of mNGS compared to conventional microbiological testing in guiding antibiotic stewardship for complex SSTIs.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from April 2023 to May 2025, enrolling 69 patients with clinically diagnosed complex SSTIs. All patients underwent concurrent mNGS testing, conventional bacterial culture, and pathological examination. The diagnostic performance of mNGS was systematically compared with culture methods, with emphasis on culture-negative cases and polymicrobial infections. The impact of mNGS-guided antibiotic adjustments was assessed.ResultsmNGS demonstrated significantly higher pathogen detection rates than conventional culture (P < 0.001), with a concordance of 37.5% between the two methods. Among 24 culture-negative patients, mNGS identified pathogens in 20 cases (83.3% detection rate). For polymicrobial infections (n = 20), culture detected pathogens in only 2 cases, whereas mNGS successfully identified multiple pathogens in the majority. Antibiotic therapy was adjusted based on mNGS results in 11.9% (8/69) of patients.ConclusionmNGS substantially improves pathogen detection in complex SSTIs compared to conventional methods. Beyond diagnostic accuracy, its clinical value lies in enabling targeted antibiotic therapy, thereby optimizing antimicrobial stewardship and potentially reducing healthcare costs.