Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Mathematical modelling review quantifies ethnic disparities in respiratory infection transmission dynamics across England

Mathematical modelling review quantifies ethnic disparities in respiratory infection transmission dy…
Photo by Antoine Dautry / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that ethnic disparities in respiratory infection transmission vary by location and social mixing patterns.

This mathematical modelling review analyzes data from the 2024-2025 Reconnect social contact survey, which included 12,484 participants across England, including major cities such as Birmingham and Liverpool. The study quantifies how differences in social mixing and demographic characteristics contribute to inequalities in respiratory infection transmission dynamics. The primary outcomes assessed were the number of contacts and attack rates, with White ethnicity serving as the comparator group.

The model found that individuals of Black ethnicity had more contacts compared to White ethnicity, with a rate ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.11-1.26). Similarly, Mixed ethnicity participants reported more contacts than White participants, showing a rate ratio of 1.31 (95% CI: 1.14-1.52). Conversely, Asian ethnicity was associated with fewer contacts compared to White ethnicity, with a rate ratio of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91).

Regarding attack rates, the national level data showed the lowest rates in White ethnicity. In Birmingham, attack rates were approximately double in Black and Mixed ethnicities compared to White ethnicity. In Liverpool, attack rates were less than 60% higher in Black and Mixed ethnicities compared to White ethnicity. The authors note that the role of additional demographic factors remains underexplored as a limitation of the current analysis.

The study concludes that while these findings quantify disparities, the role of additional demographic factors remains underexplored. Consequently, mitigation strategies must explicitly account for inequalities arising from local context. The authors do not report adverse events or discontinuations, and funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. This review highlights the complex interplay between social structure and infection risk without establishing direct causality beyond the model's quantification.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 12,484
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background In England, the burden of respiratory infections varies by ethnicity, contributing to health inequalities, but the role of additional demographic factors remains underexplored. We quantified how differences in social mixing and demographic characteristics between ethnic groups cause inequalities in transmission dynamics. Methods We analysed the association between the ethnicity and the number of contacts of 12,484 participants in the 2024 2025 Reconnect social contact survey, using a negative binomial regression model. We simulated respiratory pathogen epidemics using a compartmental model stratified by age, ethnicity, and contact levels, at a national level and in major cities in England. Findings After adjusting for demographic variables, participants of Black and Mixed ethnicities had more contacts than those of White ethnicity (rate ratios (RR): 1.18 [95% Credible Interval (CI): 1.11-1.26], and 1.31 [95% CI: 1.14-1.52]). Participants of Asian ethnicity had fewer contacts (RR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.91]). In national-level simulations, individuals of White ethnicity had the lowest attack rates due to demographic differences and mixing patterns. Local demographic structures changed simulated dynamics: attack rates in individuals of Black and Mixed ethnicities were approximately double those of White ethnicity in Birmingham, but less than 60% higher in Liverpool. Interpretation Demographic characteristics and mixing patterns create inequalities in transmission dynamics between ethnicities, while local demographic characteristics and pathogen infectiousness change the expected relative burden. To ensure mitigation strategies are effective and equitable, their evaluation must explicitly account for inequalities arising from local context.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.