Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Magrolimab plus docetaxel shows limited efficacy in metastatic lung and urothelial cancers

Magrolimab plus docetaxel shows limited efficacy in metastatic lung and urothelial cancers
Photo by Logan Voss / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that magrolimab plus docetaxel showed low response rates and a fatal adverse event, limiting its clinical utility.

This cohort study (Phase II) evaluated magrolimab combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), metastatic small cell lung cancer (mSCLC), and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who had received 1–2 (mNSCLC, mSCLC) or 2–3 prior lines of therapy (mUC). The safety run-in cohort included 9 patients; the Phase II cohorts included 29 (mNSCLC), 42 (mSCLC), and 26 (mUC) patients.

The primary outcomes were incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and objective response rate (ORR). ORR was 17.2% in mNSCLC, 4.8% in mSCLC, and 3.8% in mUC. No meaningful improvement in efficacy was observed.

Grade ≥3 magrolimab-related TEAE rates were 48.3% (mNSCLC), 47.6% (mSCLC), and 57.7% (mUC). A fatal TEAE suspected as magrolimab related (intracranial hemorrhage) occurred in one patient with mSCLC and brain metastasis. Toxicity was described as manageable.

Key limitations include early study closure, short follow-up, and limited endpoint maturity. The study provides insight into anti-CD47–containing therapies but reinforces the need for better treatments in this population.

For clinicians, these results do not support routine use of magrolimab plus docetaxel in these settings. Further research with longer follow-up is needed.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Novel treatments are needed to improve the poor prognosis of metastatic cancers. The ELEVATE Lung&UC study evaluated magrolimab plus docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), metastatic small cell lung cancer (mSCLC), and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). This phase II, open-label, multi-arm study enrolled patients who had received 1–2 (mNSCLC, mSCLC) or 2–3 prior lines of therapy (mUC) in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. A safety run-in (SRI) cohort (mNSCLC/mSCLC/mUC) followed by a phase II cohort (three groups: mNSCLC, mSCLC, mUC) were planned. Primary endpoints were incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; SRI and phase II) and objective response rate (ORR; phase II). The SRI cohort (n = 9) had no dose-limiting toxicities. In phase II (mNSCLC, 29 patients; mSCLC, 42 patients; mUC, 26 patients), ORRs were 17.2% (mNSCLC), 4.8% (mSCLC), and 3.8% (mUC). Grade ≥3 magrolimab-related TEAE rates were 48.3% (mNSCLC), 47.6% (mSCLC), and 57.7% (mUC). A fatal TEAE suspected as magrolimab related (intracranial hemorrhage) occurred in one patient with mSCLC and brain metastasis (phase II). The study was closed early, which limited the interpretation of results due to short follow-up and limited endpoint maturity. Adding magrolimab to docetaxel had manageable toxicity but no meaningful improvement in efficacy. These results provide insight into the safety and efficacy of anti-CD47–containing therapies and reinforce the need for treatments that address the unmet needs of patients with previously treated metastatic solid tumors.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.