This observational study utilized surveillance data from Espirito Santo state, Brazil, comprising 465,280 observations to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models based on signs, symptoms, and comorbidities. The analysis focused on three arboviruses: dengue, chikungunya, and Oropouche fever. The study did not report a specific follow-up duration or comparator group details.
Key results indicated that among the total observations, 261,691 cases (56.6%) were classified as dengue, 18,676 cases (4.0%) as chikungunya, and 12,174 cases (2.6%) as Oropouche fever. The remaining 179,115 cases (38.6%) were discarded. In the validation set, the predictive models achieved an ROC AUC of 0.726 for dengue, 0.851 for chikungunya, and 0.896 for Oropouche fever. P-values and confidence intervals were not reported for these outcomes.
The authors note that adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported, as these are not applicable to diagnostic modeling studies. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. The study authors suggest that these models may be useful in diagnostic work-up and arbovirus surveillance. However, because this is an observational study, causal inferences cannot be drawn, and the results should be interpreted with caution regarding their application outside the specific setting of Espirito Santo state.
View Original Abstract ↓
There is an ongoing Oropouche Fever (OF) outbreak in Brazil since 2024. There are dengue and chikungunya prediction models available, but none to help discriminate dengue, chikungunya, and OF. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate clinical prediction models for dengue, chikungunya, OF. Methods: This study uses surveillance data from Espirito Santo state / Brazil, from 2023-2025. Epidemiological investigations and biological samples were used to conclude cases as either (a) clinical-epidemiologically confirmed, (b) laboratory confirmed, or (c) discarded. The predictors were all data related to signs, symptoms, and comorbidities available in the notification forms. The analysis was performed using random forest regression models, one for each outcome, in development and validation datasets. Results: A total of 465,280 observations were analyzed, 261,691 dengue cases (56.6%), 18,676 chikungunya cases (4.0%), 12,174 OF cases (2.6%), and 179,115 discarded cases (38.6%). All three models had good discrimination and moderate to good calibration after scaling prediction. The models retained from 26 to 16 predictors each. Leukopenia and vomiting were the most discriminatory predictors for dengue, arthritis, arthralgia, and rash were the most discriminatory for chikungunya, and epidemiological features were the most relevant for OF. The dengue, chikungunya, and OF models had ROC AUC of 0.726, 0.851, and 0.896 in the validation set, respectively. Conclusion: This research identified predictors most discriminative between dengue, chikungunya, and OF. We developed and validated predictive models, one for each condition, with moderate to very good performance available at https://pedrobrasil.shinyapps.io/INDWELL/. One may use them in diagnostic work-up and arbovirus surveillance.