Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic Review Finds No BV Recurrence Reduction With Male Partner Treatment

Systematic Review Finds No BV Recurrence Reduction With Male Partner Treatment
Photo by Vitor Santos / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that treating male partners does not significantly reduce BV recurrence based on current meta-analytic evidence.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether treating male sexual partners of women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) reduces BV recurrence. The analysis included 953 couples from multiple studies, comparing combined female and male partner treatment with female-only therapy.

The primary outcome was BV recurrence rates. The pooled analysis showed no significant reduction with male partner treatment (RR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.76-1.22; p = 0.78). A sensitivity analysis excluding one study (Vodstrcil et al., 2025) also showed a neutral effect (RR = 1.08).

The authors noted moderate heterogeneity in the pooled analysis (I² = 59.9%), which was eliminated in the sensitivity analysis (I² = 0%). Adverse events were not reported. The authors caution against overstating the effectiveness of combined therapy and call for further high-quality studies.

Practice relevance: Male partner monotherapy is unlikely to reduce BV recurrence, though combined oral and topical therapy may improve female cure rates. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the heterogeneity and lack of safety data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginal discharge and shows high recurrence rates despite effective initial therapy. Emerging evidence suggests that reinfection from untreated male partners may contribute to recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether treating male sexual partners of women with BV reduces recurrence compared with treating women alone. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251006378). Five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched from inception to April 2025 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials including adult women with BV and comparing combined female and male partner treatment versus female-only treatment were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Recurrence rates were pooled using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed by the I statistic. Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots were conducted. MAIN RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials, including 953 couples, were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant reduction in BV recurrence with male partner treatment compared with standard female-only therapy (RR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.76-1.22; p = 0.78; I = 59.9%). Sensitivity analysis excluding the study by Vodstrcil et al., 2025, the only trial that implemented combined oral and topical male therapy, eliminated heterogeneity (I = 0%) and yielded a neutral effect (RR = 1.08). CONCLUSION: Male partner monotherapy is unlikely to reduce bacterial vaginosis recurrence, confirming current evidence. However, combined oral and topical therapy may improve female cure rates, highlighting the need for further high-quality studies to evaluate its effectiveness in preventing recurrence.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.