Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review of WGS-enabled IPC surveillance for CPE transmission in a London hospital trust

Review of WGS-enabled IPC surveillance for CPE transmission in a London hospital trust
Photo by Turquo Cabbit / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that WGS-enabled IPC surveillance may detect more CPE transmission events earlier than current methods, but evidence is limited to a single hospital trust.

This is a retrospective review of whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-enabled infection prevention and control (IPC) surveillance for carbapenem-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) in a large tertiary care hospital trust in London. The review synthesized data from 103 genomes (January 2021-March 2021) and 82 genomes (June 2016-October 2019), comparing WGS-enabled surveillance combining ward-level patient movement and genomic data to current IPC methods relying on spatial and temporal proximity.

The authors found that current IPC surveillance methods detected only 20.5% of genomically confirmed transmission events out of 3,423 patient contact-genome pairs, with a specificity of 98.5%. WGS-enabled surveillance provided a 25-47-day earlier detection window. Economic analysis indicated potential annualised savings of up to £3.6 million, with a return on investment exceeding 2-fold in 7 of 8 cost scenarios.

Key limitations noted include missed events arising from temporal, spatial, and cross-species mechanistic blindspots. The review does not report safety data, as adverse events were not assessed. The authors acknowledge that the evidence supports investigations into adopting WGS-enabled IPC surveillance as a standard-of-care tool, but they do not establish causality.

Practice relevance is restrained; the review suggests that WGS-enabled surveillance may be possible to disrupt and thereby mitigate the effects of AMR-driven CPE outbreaks, but this is presented as a potential benefit rather than a proven outcome. The findings are specific to the studied hospital trust and may not be generalizable.

Study Details

EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Infections caused by carbapenem-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) are a persistent and growing threat in healthcare settings. Yet, current infection prevention and control (IPC) surveillance methods, which largely rely on the spatial and temporal proximity of patients, often misattribute or miss infection transmission events. Here, we develop and retrospectively evaluate an integrated methodology that combines analyses of ward-level patient movement data and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data analyses, which provide measures of bacterial and plasmid similarity. Specifically, we evaluate this methodology across two datasets: a CPE outbreak of diverse carbapenem types (103 genomes, January 2021-March 2021) and an Imipenem-Hydrolysing {beta}-lactamase-positive CPE outbreak (82 genomes, June 2016-October 2019), using standard clinical criteria and conservative genomic thresholds to quantify how often current IPC surveillance methods correctly identify genomically confirmed transmission events. Findings show that, across 3,423 patient contact-genome pairs, current IPC surveillance methods detected only 20.5% of genomically confirmed transmission events whilst maintaining 98.5% specificity, with missed events arising from temporal, spatial, and cross-species, mechanistic blindspots. In contrast, WGS-enabled IPC surveillance methods provided a 25-47-day earlier detection window and, in a linked economic evaluation, delivered annualised savings of up to {pound}3.6 million, as well as a return on investment exceeding 2-fold in 7 of 8 cost scenarios. By operationalising high-throughput WGS data analysis with clinically relevant patient movement data, we evidence that it may be possible to disrupt and thereby mitigate the effects of AMR-driven CPE outbreaks, supporting investigations into the adoption of WGS-enabled IPC surveillance as a standard-of-care tool.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.