Systematic review of dry needling in sports athletes shows short-term pain relief but uncertain performance benefits.
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of dry needling (DN) applied to cervical and related upper-quarter regions, either alone or as an add-on, in a population of sports athletes. The review synthesized data from eight studies with short follow-up periods, comparing DN against sham interventions, no treatment, or active comparators. Safety and tolerability data were not reported across the included studies.
Regarding primary outcomes, DN demonstrated improved pain and shoulder range of motion immediately versus no treatment. However, no differences were observed when comparing DN to active comparators or sham interventions. For hemodynamic indices and inflammatory markers, the results showed inconsistent differences across the studies. Absolute numbers, effect sizes, and p-values were not reported for these specific outcomes.
Key limitations include the short follow-up duration, reliance on proxy endpoints, and the inability to infer effects on next-session performance, training continuity, or injury risk. The certainty of the evidence is rated as highly uncertain, particularly regarding claims of recovery enhancement, performance benefit, or injury prevention. Practice relevance suggests DN may provide short-term symptom modulation in sport athletes, but clinicians should interpret findings regarding performance and injury risk with caution.