This systematic review analyzed eight studies involving sports athletes who received dry needling in the neck and upper body. The procedure was compared against sham treatments or other active interventions to see how well it worked for various health goals.
Researchers found that pain levels and shoulder range of motion improved right after the treatment when compared to receiving no care. However, the study showed no clear advantage over other active treatments for these same symptoms. Findings regarding blood markers and inflammation were also inconsistent across the different studies included in the analysis.
The review highlights several important limitations, such as short follow-up periods and the use of indirect measures to judge performance. Because of these gaps, the evidence does not yet support claims that dry needling consistently enhances recovery, improves athletic performance, or prevents injuries. Readers should understand that while short-term symptom relief is possible, the long-term benefits for athletes are not yet proven.
