Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows dual-task training improves motor function in cerebral palsy childrenDual-task training improves balance and mobility in cerebral palsy

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider dual-task training for balance and mobility in cerebral palsy with moderate certainty evidence.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of dual-task training compared to conventional rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy. The analysis included 582 participants and assessed outcomes such as balance capacity, gross motor function, and functional mobility. The authors synthesized findings from multiple studies to determine the overall impact of the intervention.

The meta-analysis reported statistically significant improvements across all primary outcomes. Balance capacity showed a standardized mean difference of 1.11 with a 95% CI of 0.89 to 1.33. Gross motor function improved by 5.05 points on GMFM Dimension D (95% CI 1.30 to 8.79) and 5.23 points on GMFM Dimension E (95% CI 2.34 to 8.12). Functional mobility improved with a mean difference of -2.49 seconds on the Timed Up and Go test (95% CI -3.90 to -1.09).

The authors acknowledge several limitations including protocol and outcome variability as well as outcome-specific heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence ranges from low to moderate. Safety data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported. The authors recommend that future well-powered trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these findings.

A new analysis of 12 studies involving 582 children with cerebral palsy suggests that dual-task training may offer greater improvements in balance, gross motor function, and functional mobility compared with conventional rehabilitation alone.

Dual-task training involves performing two activities at once, such as walking while carrying a cup or balancing while answering questions. The analysis found that children who received dual-task training showed significant gains in balance capacity, standing and walking skills (measured by GMFM Dimensions D and E), and the Timed Up and Go test, which measures mobility.

However, the evidence is not strong enough to change practice yet. The studies varied widely in their protocols and outcomes, and the certainty of the evidence was low to moderate. No safety concerns were reported, but the studies did not track side effects or dropouts in a consistent way.

For now, dual-task training appears promising as a supplement to standard therapy, but larger, well-designed studies with longer follow-up are needed before it can be widely recommended. Families should discuss any new therapy with their child's care team.

What this means for you:
Dual-task training may help children with cerebral palsy improve balance and mobility, but more research is needed.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundChildren with cerebral palsy (CP) often experience cognitive–motor interference, which limits the ecological validity of traditional single-task rehabilitation. Dual-task training (DTT) integrates cognitive and motor tasks, potentially addressing this issue, but its effectiveness remains unclear due to protocol and outcome variability.MethodsA PRISMA 2020–compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched (2015 to October 16, 2025). Outcomes included balance capacity, gross motor function (GMFM Dimensions D/E), and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go, TUG). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence with GRADE.ResultsEleven RCTs (n = 582) were included. Compared with conventional rehabilitation, DTT improved balance capacity (SMD = 1.11, 95% CI 0.89–1.33; I2 = 0%), GMFM Dimension D (MD = 5.05, 95% CI 1.30–8.79; I2 = 80%) and Dimension E (MD = 5.23, 95% CI 2.34–8.12; I2 = 41%), and TUG performance (MD = −2.49 s, 95% CI − 3.90 to −1.09; I2 = 69%). Overall risk of bias was “some concerns,” with certainty of evidence ranging from low to moderate. Egger’s test for balance capacity showed no small-study effects (p = 0.721).ConclusionDTT may improve balance, gross motor function, and functional mobility in children with CP. Given outcome-specific heterogeneity and moderate certainty, results should be interpreted cautiously. Future well-powered trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up are necessary.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42046832672, identifier (CRD42046832672).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.