Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review finds NIBS may improve consciousness in MCS patients, but evidence for VS/UWS remains weak

Review finds NIBS may improve consciousness in MCS patients, but evidence for VS/UWS remains weak
Photo by David Travis / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider NIBS for MCS based on review, but recognize weak evidence for VS/UWS and need for more trials.

This narrative review summarizes research progress on central and peripheral non-invasive neuromodulation (NIBS) techniques for treating disorders of consciousness (DOC), including vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS). The review examined techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (LITUS), temporal interference (TI), median nerve stimulation (MNS), and combined therapies (e.g., TMS+MNS, LITUS+TMS). The population was patients with DOC, though specific sample sizes, settings, and follow-up durations were not reported.

The main findings indicate that certain NIBS techniques demonstrated efficacy in improving consciousness in MCS patients. However, evidence for efficacy in VS/UWS patients remains weak. For combined therapies, the review reported significantly superior synergistic effects compared to monotherapies. Exact effect sizes, absolute numbers, and statistical measures (p-values, confidence intervals) for these outcomes were not reported in the review.

Safety and tolerability data for the interventions were not reported. Key limitations of the underlying evidence include small sample sizes, a lack of control groups, and insufficient statistical power, particularly for the evidence concerning VS/UWS patients. The review proposes personalized treatment recommendations based on neural circuit damage characteristics and aims to provide a reference for standardized NIBS application. Its practice relevance is restrained as it summarizes association-based evidence; future large-sample randomized controlled trials are recommended to verify long-term efficacy.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Disorders of Consciousness (DOC) are characterized by abnormal function or disrupted connectivity of consciousness-related neural circuits, mainly presenting as Vegetative State/Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (VS/UWS) and Minimally Conscious State (MCS), which impose a heavy burden on patients’ families and society. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) has emerged as a core research direction for DOC treatment due to its non-invasiveness, ease of operation, and favorable safety profile. Based on the classification of consciousness-related neural circuits, this review systematically summarizes the research progress of central and peripheral non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, including their potential regulatory mechanisms on core circuits (such as the frontoparietal network, cortico-thalamocortical circuit, and ascending reticular activating system), clinical evidence, and synergistic effects of combined therapies. Studies have shown that techniques like Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) targeting the frontoparietal network, Low-Intensity Transcranial Focused Ultrasound (LITUS, also referred to as Transcranial Focused Ultrasound [TUS]/transcranial Focused Ultrasound [tFUS] in the field) and Temporal Interference (TI) regulating the cortico-thalamocortical circuit, and Median Nerve Stimulation (MNS) activating the ascending reticular activating system have demonstrated certain efficacy in improving consciousness in MCS patients, while the evidence for efficacy in VS/UWS patients remains weak due to small sample sizes, lack of control groups and insufficient statistical power. Combined therapies such as TMS + MNS and Transcranial Focused Ultrasound LITUS+TMS exhibit significantly superior synergistic effects compared to monotherapies. By horizontally comparing the advantages and limitations of various techniques, this review proposes personalized treatment recommendations based on the characteristics of neural circuit damage. It also points out that future research should optimize stimulation parameters, clarify the specificity of circuit regulation, and verify long-term efficacy through large-sample randomized controlled trials (RCTs), aiming to provide a reference for the standardized and precise application of NIBS in DOC treatment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.