Active rTMS combined with rehabilitation showed greater improvement in language and swallowing outcomes compared with sham stimulation in 113 post-stroke patients.
This sham-controlled prospective study enrolled 113 patients with post-stroke communication and swallowing impairment to evaluate the effects of active rTMS combined with conventional rehabilitation versus sham stimulation plus the same rehabilitation program. The intervention aimed to enhance recovery in patients experiencing post-stroke language impairment and dysphagia. Outcomes were assessed after treatment completion.
The active rTMS group showed greater improvement in language-related and swallowing-related outcomes compared with the sham stimulation group. Additionally, the active rTMS group maintained a more favorable recovery profile at follow-up compared with sham stimulation plus rehabilitation. Directionally similar trends were observed across groups for secondary clinical and care-related indicators. No increase in safety risk was identified during the study period, and tolerability was acceptable.
Key limitations include the lack of neurophysiological or neuroimaging markers, which limited mechanistic interpretation to theory-informed inference. The study also had a short-term follow-up and lacked direct neurophysiological measures. Durability of benefit and patient-level heterogeneity in treatment response remain uncharacterized. Causality cannot be definitively established without further randomized studies with longer follow-up and direct neurophysiological measures.
Practice relevance suggests that findings support further investigation of rTMS as an adjunct to multidisciplinary neurorehabilitation. However, mechanisms, durability of benefit, and patient-level heterogeneity need further investigation in randomized studies with longer follow-up and direct neurophysiological measures.