Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Patients with migration background had higher rates of delayed presentation and lower EVT rates after first-ever ischemic stroke.

Patients with migration background had higher rates of delayed presentation and lower EVT rates afte…
Photo by mostafa meraji / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that patients with migration background present later and receive EVT less frequently in this single-center cohort.

This observational cohort study included 232 patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke presenting to a Dutch Comprehensive Stroke Center. The analysis compared patients with a migration background against those without a migration background regarding presentation timing, reperfusion therapy, and clinical characteristics. The study was conducted at a single center in the Netherlands.

Patients with a migration background were more likely to present outside the therapeutic time window, with an odds ratio of 1.90 (95% CI 1.05-3.45). Specifically, 53.2% of this group presented late compared to 37.1% of the comparator group. Conversely, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was less frequent in patients with a migration background (8.1% vs 22.4%, OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.75).

Demographic and stroke characteristics differed between groups. Patients with a migration background were younger (66.6 vs 71.2 years) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes (27.4% vs 15.9%). Small vessel disease was more common in this group (69.4% vs 48.2%), whereas cardio-embolism was less common (4.8% vs 15.3%). Sex distribution was similar (59.7% vs 60.6% male). Door-to-treatment time (38min vs 30min), door-to-needle time (35min vs 26min), and door-to-groin time (64min vs 54min) showed no significant differences.

Safety data, including adverse events, were not reported. The study is limited by its single-center design. Associations observed may reflect prehospital and within-hospital barriers rather than inherent patient factors. Further insight is needed to address facilitators and barriers for appropriate management of this population.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
Sample sizen = 232
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Objective: To assess ethnic disparities in time to hospital presentation, use of acute reperfusion therapies, and in-hospital treatment times among patients presenting with stroke in a Dutch emergency department. Methods: In this single-centre observational cohort study, we included patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke between September 2020 and September 2021. Patients were categorized by ethnicity (with or without migration background). Demographic and stroke characteristics were compared between groups. Outcomes included: rates of presentation outside therapeutic time window, acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)), and, when applicable, door-to-treatment time (DTTT), with a door-to-needle time (DTNT) and door-to-groin time (DTGT) for IVT and EVT respectively. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, and NIHSS at presentation, where appropriate. Results: A total of 232 patients were included, of whom 62 (26.7%) had a migration background. These patients were younger (66.6 vs 71.2 years) and more frequently had diabetes (27.4% vs 15.9%). Sex distribution was similar (59.7% vs 60.6% male). Stroke etiology differed between groups with less cardio-embolism (4.8% vs 15.3%) and more small vessel disease (69.4% vs 48.2%) among patients with a migration background. These latter patients presented more often outside the therapeutic time window (53.2% vs 37.1%; OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.05-3.45). EVT was less frequently performed in patients with a migration background compared to those without (8.1% vs 22.4%; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.75). There were no significant differences in treatment times (DTTT 38min vs 30min, DTNT 35min vs 26min, DTGT 64min vs 54min). Conclusion: Patients with a migration background were more likely to present outside the therapeutic time window and had a lower rate of EVT. In order to improve access for these patients, more insight into prehospital and within hospital barriers and facilitators for appropriate management are needed.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.