Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Frexalimab study validates PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 in relapsing multiple sclerosis patientsNew tools reliably measure fatigue in multiple sclerosis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider using validated PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 for evaluating treatment benefits in RMS clinical trials.

A Phase 2 trial evaluated the psychometric properties of the PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 questionnaires in adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis. The primary outcome focused on psychometric validation, while secondary outcomes included reliability, convergent validity, construct validity, and sensitivity to change. The follow-up period was Week 12.

Item-to-item correlations were acceptable with effect sizes ranging from 0.4 to 0.9. Internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was excellent with values greater than 0.90. Test-retest reliability was described as good. Convergent validity between PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a T-scores and MSIS-29v2 or PGIS-Fatigue showed high correlations with r values greater than 0.50. Construct validity analysis revealed significant differences between groups defined by PGIS-Fatigue scores, with a p-value less than 0.0001. Sensitivity to change showed statistically significant differences in mean change from baseline at Week 12.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and overall tolerability were not reported. The study had limited psychometric studies conducted using the PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 questionnaires as a key limitation. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported.

The PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 are valid and reliable measures for evaluating treatment benefits in clinical trials of RMS. Practice relevance is restricted to this specific context.

Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis, but measuring it accurately has been a challenge. Now, a Phase 2 trial shows that two simple questionnaires can reliably capture fatigue in people with relapsing MS.

The study tested the PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 questionnaires in adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis. The results were strong: the tools showed excellent internal consistency (meaning the questions hang together well) and good test-retest reliability (meaning the results are stable over time). They also showed high correlations with other measures of fatigue, and could detect differences between groups with varying fatigue levels.

Importantly, the questionnaires were sensitive to change over 12 weeks, meaning they can pick up on improvements or worsening. This makes them useful for clinical trials testing new treatments like frexalimab, the drug being studied in this trial.

However, the study is limited by the fact that few psychometric studies have been done with these specific questionnaires in MS. More research is needed to confirm their usefulness across different populations and settings.

What this means for you:
Two questionnaires are valid and reliable for measuring fatigue in relapsing MS trials.

Study Details

Study typePhase2
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: There are limited psychometric studies conducted using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Short Form-Fatigue-Multiple Sclerosis 8a (PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a) and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 version 2 (MSIS-29v2) questionnaires. METHODS: Data were collected from a phase 2 trial (NCT04879628) investigating frexalimab in adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Reliability, convergent validity, construct validity, and sensitivity to change were assessed on PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman's or polyserial correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance, respectively. Analyses were conducted using baseline and Week 12 data from pooled treatment arms. RESULTS: Item-to-item correlations were acceptable (0.4-0.9) for most of the items for both patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and Week 12. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha >0.90) for both PROs at baseline and Week 12. Additionally, good test-retest reliability was observed for PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and the physical and psychological domains of MSIS-29v2. Convergent validity was supported by high correlations (r>0.50) between the PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a T-score and the MSIS-29v2 and the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)-Fatigue at baseline and Week 12. Construct validity was supported by significant differences between groups defined by the PGIS-Fatigue scores at baseline and Week 12 for both PROs (p<0.0001). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by statistically significant differences in the mean change from baseline at Week 12 among groups defined by the PGIS-Fatigue and the Patient Global Impression of Change-Fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 are valid and reliable measures for evaluating treatment benefits in clinical trials of RMS.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.