Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows rTMS reduces post-stroke shoulder pain in stroke survivors.

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows rTMS reduces post-stroke shoulder pain in stroke survivors…
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider rTMS for post-stroke shoulder pain based on significant short-term pain reduction.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for managing post-stroke shoulder pain. The analysis included over 500 stroke survivors across multiple studies, with follow-up duration not reported. The primary outcome measured pain intensity using the visual analog scale or numeric rating scale.

secondary_outcomes included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Barthel Index, and shoulder range of motion. The pooled effect size for pain intensity was a weighted mean difference of -1.62 with a 95% CI of -2.00 to -1.24 and a p-value less than 0.00001. Functional assessments also showed significant improvement, though specific effect sizes were not reported for these secondary outcomes.

The authors note that high-quality, multi-center randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings. Safety data, including adverse events and tolerability, were not reported in the included studies. The review supports incorporating rTMS into stroke rehabilitation protocols while cautioning against overstatement of long-term benefits or optimization of stimulation parameters.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 500
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Post-stroke shoulder pain (PSSP) is a common complication of stroke survivors, substantially impeding upper-limb functional recovery and diminishing quality of life. Conventional treatments usually target peripheral symptoms and only yield limited or transient benefits. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown analgesic potential in various neuropathic pain conditions, yet its efficacy in PSSP lacks systematic evaluation. METHODS: Eight databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating rTMS interventions for PSSP. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale or numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Barthel Index, and shoulder range of motion. Risk assessment and data analysis were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1, with heterogeneity quantified by the I statistic and subgroup analyses conducted to explore its potential sources. RESULTS: 12 RCTs involving over 500 participants met the inclusion criteria. Results revealed that rTMS significantly reduced pain intensity compared to control (WMD: -1.62; 95% CI: -2.00, -1.24;  < 0.00001). Additionally, rTMS significantly improved the FMA, MBI scores and shoulder ROM. CONCLUSION: rTMS appears to be a promising intervention for reducing PSSP and enhancing upper-limb motor function. These findings support incorporating rTMS into stroke rehabilitation protocols. In the future, high-quality, multi-center RCTs with extended follow-up are warranted to optimize stimulation parameters and validate long-term benefits.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.