Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review proposes return-to-learn definitions for student concussion recovery in academic settings

Systematic review proposes return-to-learn definitions for student concussion recovery in academic s…
Photo by Clayton Robbins / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider proposed RTL definitions as preliminary frameworks requiring validation before clinical use.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 24 studies from 456 reviewed articles to analyze operational definitions of return-to-learn (RTL), return-to-school, return-to-class, and return-to-academics following concussion. The review focused on student populations in academic settings, including colleges/universities and middle/high schools. No specific intervention or comparator was reported, as the study focused on defining recovery criteria rather than evaluating treatments.

The review identified five recovery criteria used across studies: guided protocols, clinician determinations/clearance, school attendance and days missed, resumption of full academic workload, and full-time attendance without accommodations. Based on this analysis, the authors proposed evidence-based definitions for RTL. For college/university settings, the proposed definition includes resolution of injury-associated symptoms (with and without academic engagement), resumption of pre-injury accommodation usage, full academic participation including attendance for all registered courses, and stable cognitive functioning consistent with pre-injury baseline.

For middle and high school settings, the proposed definition requires tolerating full academic demands without symptom recurrence or worsening, returning to typical school schedule and workload (including extracurricular academic activities), no longer requiring modified cognitive activity levels or informal classroom supports, and demonstrating stable cognitive functioning consistent with pre-injury baseline. No safety or tolerability data were reported, as the review focused on definitions rather than interventions.

Key limitations include the heterogeneous definitions of academic recovery across studies, creating limited reproducibility of data. The RTL definitions also display gaps that do not account for logistical factors influencing return-to-learn across different educational settings. Additionally, the definitions lack a holistic approach, potentially allowing students to prematurely satisfy recovery criteria. The practice relevance is that novel definitions specific to students' individualized academic paths, yet representative of their academic setting, are needed. These proposed definitions require validation before clinical implementation.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionAcademic recovery following concussion has been defined in various contexts, however, these definitions vary considerably leading to heterogenous data and limited application. Standardized definitions have also been published, though their formation are not transparently described. Therefore, this research aimed to report the various operational definitions of return-to-learn, return-to-school, return-to-class, and return-to-academics found within the literature and propose evidence-based definitions for return-to-learn (RTL).MethodsWe searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for eligible studies that were (i) published in a peer-reviewed journal between January 2010, to January 2023, (ii) originally published in English, and (iii) had a full text available, (iv) measured RTL, return-to-school, return-to-the-classroom, or return-to-academics within a student sample, and (v) provided a clear definition or description of RTL completion criteria. Definitions of RTL, return-to-school, return-to-the-classroom, or return-to-academics along with outcome measure data (recovery times, group data, etc.) were extracted independently by three researchers and reached unanimous agreement.ResultsThe review yielded 456 articles, with 24 meeting inclusion criteria. Five recovery criteria were used across the studies: (i) guided protocols, (ii) clinician determinations/clearance, (iii) school attendance and days missed, (iv) resumption of full academic workload, and (v) full-time without accommodations. The proposed definition of RTL for college/universities is when the following criteria are met, (i) resolution of injury-associated symptoms, with and without academic engagement, (ii) resume pre-injury usage of accommodations, (iii) full academic participation—attend all registered courses, once minimum, attendance for the full time, (iv) cognitive functioning is stable and consistent with pre-injury baseline. The proposed definition of RTL for middle and high schools when the following criteria are met, (i) tolerates full academic demands without recurrence or worsening of injury-associated symptoms, (ii) has returned to their typical school schedule and workload, including extracurricular academic activities if applicable, (iii) no longer requires modified cognitive activity levels or informal classroom supports, (iv) demonstrates stable cognitive functioning consistent with their pre-injury baseline.DiscussionAcademic recovery is defined by the literature in various ways, creating limited reproducibility of data. RTL definitions also display several gaps that do not account for logistical factors influencing return-to-learn across university and K-12 settings. Definitions lack a holistic approach, indicating that students may be prematurely satisfying recovery criteria. Novel definitions of recovery that are specific to the students individualized academic path, yet representative of the academic setting, are needed. The proposed definitions account for these variables, while remaining evidence-based.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.