Narrative review proposes integrative monitoring framework for intracerebral hemorrhage
This narrative review examines the limitations of current monitoring strategies for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The authors argue that conventional imaging and single biomarkers fail to capture the dynamic substrate-execution-amplification network underlying secondary brain injury. They propose a multidimensional integrative framework that combines iron metabolism with inflammatory indices, brain-derived exosomes, F4-neuroprostanes, and quantitative susceptibility mapping.
The review highlights that single biomarkers are susceptible to systemic inflammatory confounding, and conventional imaging lacks molecular sensitivity. The proposed framework aims to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the pathophysiological processes after ICH.
Key limitations noted by the authors include the current inability to capture the dynamic network of injury and the lack of molecular sensitivity in standard imaging. The framework is suggested to facilitate stratification of patients who may respond to iron chelation and anti-ferroptotic therapies, though no clinical data are presented.
As a narrative review, this article offers a conceptual synthesis rather than pooled quantitative results. The practice relevance is theoretical, pending validation in clinical studies. Clinicians should interpret these proposals as hypothesis-generating rather than evidence-based recommendations.