Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Multidisciplinary cooperation nutrition management processes provide a standardized framework for critically ill patient careExperts agree on nutrition process for ICU patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Utilize structured multidisciplinary cooperation processes to standardize nutritional management for critically ill patients.

This expert consensus establishes a standardized, scientific, and practical multidisciplinary cooperation nutrition management process specifically designed for critically ill patients in intensive care units. The scope of the consensus involved developing structured protocols for both general multidisciplinary nutrition management and specific enteral nutrition management processes.

The experts evaluated 31 criteria to form the basis of this management framework. These 31 criteria were rated as desirable or necessary by 17-20 evaluators, representing a rate of 85-100%. The primary goal of these guidelines is to provide a structured operational process for clinical practice in ICU and other relevant departments.

Because this is an expert consensus rather than a clinical trial, the findings do not provide direct evidence of improved patient outcomes or safety. Instead, it offers a standardized framework intended to guide clinical practice. No specific limitations were reported by the authors regarding the implementation of these processes.

How this fits prior evidence

This guideline addresses a gap in standardized operational procedures for nutritional support in critical illness. While prior coverage noted that high-protein supplementation does not reduce mortality in critical illness, this consensus focuses on the organizational and multidisciplinary framework required to manage nutrition safely and effectively in ICU settings.

A group of 20 experts in China has developed a standardized nutrition management process for critically ill patients in the ICU. The process focuses on multidisciplinary cooperation and includes steps for enteral nutrition management. The goal is to make nutritional support more effective and safer.

The experts used a Delphi method to reach consensus on 31 criteria. All 31 criteria were rated as desirable or necessary by 85 to 100 percent of the evaluators. This means the experts strongly agreed on the key components of the nutrition process.

It is important to note that this is not a clinical trial. The study did not test the process in actual patients or compare it to other methods. So, we do not have direct evidence that this process improves patient outcomes. The study only shows that experts agree on what a good nutrition process should look like.

For now, this expert consensus can guide hospitals in setting up structured nutrition management for ICU patients. However, more research is needed to see if following this process actually leads to better results for patients.

What this means for you:
Experts agree on a standardized nutrition process for ICU care, but patient benefits are not yet proven.

Common questions

What is a Delphi expert consensus?

It is a method where experts answer questionnaires in rounds to reach agreement on a topic. In this study, 20 experts in China agreed on 31 criteria for a nutrition process for ICU patients.

Does this study prove the nutrition process helps patients?

No. This study only shows that experts agree on what the process should look like. It did not test the process in patients, so we do not know if it improves outcomes.

Who can use this nutrition process?

The process is designed for critically ill patients in the ICU. It can guide clinical practice in ICUs and other departments, but it is not a proven treatment.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveTo explore a multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill ICU patients in China for providing a standardized nutrition management process and improving the effect and safety of nutritional support.MethodsOur first draft of the “multidisciplinary nutrition management process for critical patients” and “enteral nutrition management process for critical patients”, which included five steps and 31 criteria, was prepared through literature review and analysis, referring to the domestic and foreign nutrition management guidelines for critical patients, and referring to the nutrition management process for critically ill patients abroad. We recruited consulting experts from Beijing, Zhejiang, Jilin, Guangdong, and Chongqing in China. Using the Delphi method, we conducted expert consultations to evaluate the initially prepared standardized process, subsequently refining and adjusting items based on their feedback.ResultsAfter two rounds of expert consultation, all 20 invited experts completed both rounds, 15 experts provided written opinions, and 43 expert opinions were collected. The nutrition management process was bifurcated into “multidisciplinary nutrition management process for critically ill patients” and “enteral nutrition management process for critically ill patients,” which collectively included five steps (within 24 h of admission, within 24–48 h of admission, after 48 h of admission and during hospitalization, during transfer to another department, and during discharge) and 31 standard processes. The 31 criteria were rated as desirable or necessary by 17–20 evaluators (85–100%).ConclusionThe multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill patients established by us using the Delphi method is scientific and standardized and shows promise as a practical tool that may improve for nutritional management.Relevance to clinical practiceStructured multidisciplinary nutrition management operational processes can guide clinical practice. They has potential for implementation in similar settings in the clinical nutrition management of critically ill patients in the ICU or other departments.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.