Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Socioeconomic factors in Ekiti State, Nigeria, show urban-rural differences in diet and nutritionStudy in Nigeria finds urban and rural dietary differences and similar underweight rates

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note urban-rural socioeconomic disparities in diet and nutrition in Ekiti State requiring tailored interventions.

This descriptive cross-sectional survey examined socioeconomic factors among 350 adults residing in selected urban and rural communities within Ekiti State, Nigeria. The study compared these two populations to evaluate variations in income, education, household conditions, and nutritional status.

Urban respondents demonstrated higher education levels, with 48.8% holding tertiary degrees, compared to rural counterparts. Conversely, rural households relied more heavily on farming for dependency, accounting for 35.0% of the rural profile. Income disparities were also evident, as 62.0% of rural households reported incomes below 70,000 Naira.

Dietary patterns varied significantly by location. Urban diets favored legumes at 58.4% and cereals at 56.0%. In contrast, rural diets were predominated by sugar and honey at 90.0% and roots and tubers at 71.0%. Nutritional knowledge was reported as higher in urban areas. Regarding nutritional status, 20.4% of urban and 22.0% of rural respondents were underweight. Combined overweight and obesity affected 18.4% of urban and 25.0% of rural participants.

The study did not report adverse events, discontinuations, or specific tolerability issues. Key limitations include the cross-sectional design, which precludes causal inference, and the reliance on self-reported or survey-derived data without detailed p-values or confidence intervals provided in the source text. Practice relevance suggests that state-specific interventions are necessary to address both food insecurity and emerging diet-related chronic disease risks in this region.

Researchers conducted a survey to understand how living in a city or the countryside relates to diet and nutrition in Ekiti State, Nigeria. They asked 350 adults about their income, education, and what they eat. The goal was to see if where people live affects their food choices and health.

The study found clear differences. People in urban areas tended to have more education and better knowledge about nutrition. Their diets included more legumes and cereals. In rural areas, households were more likely to have low incomes and depend on farming. Their diets were heavier in foods like sugar, honey, roots, and tubers.

When looking at body weight, the survey found similar problems in both areas. About one in five people in both urban and rural communities were underweight. At the same time, being overweight or obese was also common, affecting roughly 18-25% of people, with rates slightly higher in rural areas. This suggests communities face a double challenge of food insecurity and risks from less healthy diets.

It's important to remember this was a single, small survey from one state in Nigeria. It shows a snapshot of local patterns but cannot prove that living in a certain area causes these health outcomes. The findings highlight that nutrition challenges are complex and exist in both city and countryside settings.

What this means for you:
A local survey found different dietary patterns but similar weight issues in urban and rural Nigeria, highlighting complex nutrition challenges.

Study Details

EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Introduction: Adults in Nigeria face a growing nutrition challenge: while some struggle with undernutrition, others are increasingly affected by overweight and obesity. This double burden of malnutrition reflects socioeconomic divides, where income, education, and household conditions shape food choices and health. This study examined how socioeconomic factors influence dietary diversity, nutritional knowledge, and nutritional status among adults in urban and rural communities of Ekiti State. Methods and Analysis: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among 350 adults selected via multistage sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. Dietary diversity was assessed using food group frequency, and nutritional status was determined by BMI. Associations were analyzed using chi-square tests (p < 0.05). Results: Significant urban-rural divides were identified: urban respondents were more educated (48.8% tertiary), while rural households were more dependent on farming (35.0%) and low-income (62.0% <70,000). Dietary patterns differed significantly: urban diets favored legumes (58.4%) and cereals (56.0%), while rural diets predominated in sugar/honey (90.0%) and roots/tubers (71.0%). Nutritional knowledge was higher in urban areas. Nutritional status revealed a dual burden: 20.4% of urban and 22.0% of rural respondents were underweight, while combined overweight/obesity affected 18.4% of urban and 25.0% of rural participants. Conclusion: Socioeconomic factors strongly dictate dietary choices and health in Ekiti State. Urban areas show greater diversity but rising obesity risks, while rural areas face persistent undernutrition. These findings highlight the need for tailored, state-specific interventions addressing both food insecurity and emerging diet-related chronic disease risks. Keywords: Socioeconomic factors, Dietary diversity, Nutritional knowledge, Double burden of malnutrition, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.