Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Participatory theory of change development aims to reduce relapse in children recovering from severe acute malnutrition in Mali.

Participatory theory of change development aims to reduce relapse in children recovering from severe…
Photo by Bhupathi Srinu / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that a participatory theory of change may address relapse causes in SAM recovery, but impact remains unproven.

A systematic review assessed a participatory development of a theory of change designed to monitor children recovering from severe acute malnutrition in Mali. The intervention included health checks and the provision of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) at treatment sites. The review did not report the sample size, specific study design details, or statistical outcomes such as p-values or confidence intervals. The follow-up period for the proposed monitoring was six months.

The analysis identified three direct causes of relapse: inadequate initial treatment, inadequate dietary intake after discharge, and frequent illness episodes combined with inadequate treatment seeking. Correspondingly, the intervention aimed to improve initial acute malnutrition treatment, enhance nutritional intake post-discharge, and decrease illness incidence while increasing health service utilization. No data on absolute numbers or effect sizes were reported in the review.

Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events or discontinuations, were not reported. The review noted a key limitation: the theory of change will underpin a process evaluation that must accompany an impact evaluation to determine if and how the intervention actually reduces relapse. Consequently, the practice relevance is currently theoretical, as the proposed intervention was built around existing programs for post-treatment monitoring but its efficacy has not been statistically confirmed.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionUp to 76% of children treated for acute malnutrition relapse within 6 months from discharge. Despite its known negative impact on children's health and the drain on health system's scarce resources, few studies have explored ways to reduce relapse. In order to design an intervention that can work, there is a need to thoroughly understand the drivers of relapse in a context.ObjectiveWe aimed to develop a robust theory of change (ToC) for how relapse can be reduced in Mali and propose an intervention package that is feasible for the health system to adopt with minimal external support.MethodsWe applied a four-step approach to develop the ToC including: (1) An evidence review of potential drivers of malnutrition and relapse locally, based on surveys, gray literature and scientific articles, (2) Schematization of the most important immediate and underlying causes of relapse based on step 1 in a problem tree style and development of a ToC for a program that aims to address the causes, (3) Validation of the ToC with local stakeholders, and (4) Identification of facilitators, barriers and assumptions. Most work was done through on-line workshops including participants from local Ministry of Health (MoH), a local university (USTTB) and both global and local IRC nutrition staff. One in-person workshop was organized with local stakeholders from technical partners and different levels of local health authorities to finalize the ToC.ResultsThree direct causes of relapse were identified: (1) Inadequate initial treatment, (2) Inadequate dietary intake post-discharge, and (3) Frequent illness episodes combined with inadequate treatment seeking. To reduce relapse post-treatment, three aims were identified: (1) Improving initial acute malnutrition treatment, (2) Improving nutritional intake after discharge, (3) Decreasing incidence of illness and increasing use of health services. The proposed intervention was built around a program for the post-treatment monitoring of children at the treatment sites including health checks and the provision of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements for children. Inputs included initial and on-going training, supplies and equipment, and supervision and coordination.ConclusionThe development of a comprehensive ToC to prevent relapse allowed us to design an intervention that tackles the key perceived and evidenced drivers of relapse in the context. This ToC will underpin a process evaluation that will need to accompany an impact evaluation to determine if and how the intervention reduces relapse.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.