Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis shows combined bariatric and body contouring surgery improves quality of life and weight loss versus bariatric surgery alone

Meta-analysis shows combined bariatric and body contouring surgery improves quality of life and weig…
Photo by Aakash Dhage / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that combined bariatric and body contouring surgery yields substantial improvements in quality of life compared to bariatric surgery alone.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined outcomes for patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone compared to those receiving combined bariatric and body contouring surgery. The study included data from fifteen non-randomized studies involving a large cohort of patients. Researchers assessed patient-reported outcomes, total weight loss, and various functional domains including body image and psychological health.

The analysis revealed that patients receiving the combined procedure experienced significantly greater percentage of total weight loss. Furthermore, improvements in body image, physical, psychological, sexual, and social function were consistently favored in the combined surgery group. Patients desiring body contouring also reported lower body satisfaction and lower appraisal of excess skin scores prior to the procedure.

The authors highlight that the evidence base relies on non-randomized studies, which limits the ability to infer strict causation. Safety data such as adverse events were not reported in the included studies. Despite these limitations, the findings suggest that adding body contouring drives durable multidimensional recovery and enhances long-term patient satisfaction.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 7,339
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Massive weight loss after bariatric surgery (BS) often results in excess skin, leading to physical discomfort and impaired quality of life (QoL). Body contouring surgery (BCS) addresses these issues by restoring body image, improving function, and enhancing overall QoL, but its added value on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains underexplored. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted from inception to March of 2025. Studies comparing PROMs between patients undergoing BS alone and those undergoing BS + BCS were included. Retrieved studies were assessed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Outcomes were pooled using random effects models. RESULTS: Fifteen non-randomized studies involving 7339 patients were included (BS, 4339 [59.1%]; BS + BCS, 3000 [40.9%]). Patients undergoing BS + BCS had a significantly greater percentage of total weight loss (mean difference [MD], 4.40% [95% CI, 1.69, 7.10]; P < 0.01). BODY-Q improvements favored the BS + BCS group in body image, physical, psychological, sexual, and social function (MD, 16.07 [95% CI, 12.14, 20.0]; P < 0.01). Among patients receiving only BS, those desiring BCS reported lower body satisfaction (MD, -0.40 [95% CI, -0.70, -0.10]; P < 0.01) and lower appraisal of excess skin scores (standardized MD, -1.09 [95% CI, -1.83, -0.36]; P = 0.02) than those without desire for BCS. CONCLUSIONS: BCS after BS yields substantial improvements in overall QoL. These findings highlight the importance of BCS as a fundamental element of comprehensive postbariatric care that significantly enhances long-term patient satisfaction and drives durable multidimensional recovery.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.